Lack of association between pandemic chilblains and SARS-CoV-2 infection

An increased incidence of chilblains has been observed during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and attributed to viral infection. Direct evidence of this relationship has been limited, however, as most cases do not have molecular evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 119; no. 9; pp. 1 - 9
Main Authors Gehlhausen, Jeff R., Little, Alicia J., Ko, Christine J., Emmenegger, Marc, Lucas, Carolina, Wong, Patrick, Klein, Jon, Lu, Peiwen, Mao, Tianyang, Jaycox, Jillian, Wang, Eric, Ugwu, Nelson, Muenker, Cate, Mekael, Dilgash, Klein, Rhonda Q., Patrignelli, Robert, Antaya, Richard, McNiff, Jennifer, Damsky, William, Kamath, Kathy, Shon, John, Ring, Aaron M., Yildirim, Inci, Omer, Saad, Ko, Albert I., Aguzzi, Adriano, Iwasaki, Akiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:An increased incidence of chilblains has been observed during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and attributed to viral infection. Direct evidence of this relationship has been limited, however, as most cases do not have molecular evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with PCR or antibodies. We enrolled a cohort of 23 patients who were diagnosed and managed as having SARS-CoV-2–associated skin eruptions (including 21 pandemic chilblains [PC]) during the first wave of the pandemic in Connecticut. Antibody responses were determined through endpoint titration enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and serum epitope repertoire analysis. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 were assessed by T cell receptor sequencing and in vitro SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific peptide stimulation assays. Immunohistochemical and PCR studies of PC biopsies and tissue microarrays for evidence of SARS-CoV-2 were performed. Among patients diagnosed and managed as “covid toes” during the pandemic, we find a percentage of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (9.5%) that approximates background seroprevalence (8.5%) at the time. Immunohistochemistry studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 staining in PC biopsies may not be from SARS-CoV-2. Our results do not support SARS-CoV-2 as the causative agent of pandemic chilblains; however, our study does not exclude the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 seronegative abortive infections.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
1A complete list of the Yale IMPACT Team can be found in SI Appendix.
Contributed by Akiko Iwasaki; received December 6, 2021; accepted January 5, 2022; reviewed by Shawn Demerhi and Elizabeth Grice
Author contributions: J.R.G., S.O., A.I.K., A.A., and A.I. designed research; J.R.G., A.J.L., C.J.K., M.E., C.L., P.W., J.K., P.L., T.M., J.J., E.W., Y.I.T., N.U., C.M., D.M., R.A., J.M., K.K., A.M.R., and I.Y. performed research; A.J.L., C.J.K., M.E., R.Q.K., R.P., R.A., J.M., W.D., J.S., A.M.R., I.Y., and A.A. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.R.G., M.E., C.L., P.W., J.K., P.L., T.M., J.J., E.W., K.K., J.S., A.M.R., S.O., A.I.K., A.A., and A.I. analyzed data; Y.I.T. processed, stored, and distributed biospecimens; A.I. supervised the project and established collaborations; and J.R.G. and A.I. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2122090119