Forest visitor perceptions of recreational impacts on amphibian wildlife

Recreational activities have become a major use of forests but have also been widely cast as having a negative impact on wildlife and related nature conservation. Natural science analyses dominate the study of the relationship between recreation and wildlife, and yet, there are also critical social...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of wildlife research Vol. 61; no. 4; pp. 505 - 515
Main Authors Levêque, Jonas, Marzano, Mariella, Broome, Alice, Connolly, Tom, Dandy, Norman
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.08.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recreational activities have become a major use of forests but have also been widely cast as having a negative impact on wildlife and related nature conservation. Natural science analyses dominate the study of the relationship between recreation and wildlife, and yet, there are also critical social scientific dimensions. These include understanding the beliefs that recreationists hold regarding how their activities impact on wild species and their habitats. These beliefs are important because individual understandings of the consequences of behaviours are closely related to how they behave in practice. This paper presents a study of the perceptions of forest visitors concerning recreational impacts on amphibians, such as the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Amphibians have been neglected in the recreational disturbance literature despite posing some of the most substantial conservation challenges. In this study, data generated by a face-to-face survey of visitors at two forest sites in Scotland reveals that nearly half of recreationists surveyed did not believe that their activities had much impact on amphibians but pointed to other activities as being responsible for any potential issues. Recreationists who visit forests the most felt that they had the least impact. Despite this, management methods to reduce recreational disturbance are broadly supported. Respondents also indicated that they favoured forms of communication such as codes of conduct and educational programmes, as ways to raise awareness and learn about this issue. We conclude by reflecting on the implications of our results for forest managers who may wish to engage visitors and minimise the disturbance of wildlife.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0920-x
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1612-4642
1439-0574
DOI:10.1007/s10344-015-0920-x