Chimeric hemagglutinin vaccine elicits broadly protective CD4 and CD8 T cell responses against multiple influenza strains and subtypes
Vaccination has been used to control the spread of seasonal flu; however, the virus continues to evolve and escape from host immune response through mutation and increasing glycosylation. Efforts have been directed toward development of a universal vaccine with broadly protective activity against mu...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 30; pp. 17757 - 17763 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
28.07.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Vaccination has been used to control the spread of seasonal flu; however, the virus continues to evolve and escape from host immune response through mutation and increasing glycosylation. Efforts have been directed toward development of a universal vaccine with broadly protective activity against multiple influenza strains and subtypes. Here we report the design and evaluation of various chimeric vaccines based on the most common avian influenza H5 and human influenza H1 sequences. Of these constructs, the chimeric HA (cHA) vaccine with consensus H5 as globular head and consensus H1 as stem was shown to elicit broadly protective CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell responses. Interestingly, the monoglycosylated cHA (cHAmg) vaccine with GlcNAc on each glycosite induced more stem-specific antibodies, with higher antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and better neutralizing and stronger cross-protection activities against H1, H3, H5, and H7 strains and subtypes. Moreover, the cHAmg vaccine combined with a glycolipid adjuvant designed for class switch further enhanced the vaccine efficacy with more IFN-γ, IL-4, and CD8⁺ memory T cells produced. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Contributed by Chi-Huey Wong, June 8, 2020 (sent for review March 16, 2020; reviewed by Sabine Flitsch, Yasuhiro Kajihara, and Mark von Itzstein) Reviewers: S.F., University of Manchester; Y.K., Osaka University; and M.v.I., Griffith University. Author contributions: H.-Y.L. and C.-H.W. designed research; H.-Y.L., S.-C.W., Y.-A.K., K.-I.L., C.M., and T.-J.R.C. performed research; H.-Y.L., T.-J.R.C., and C.-H.W. analyzed data; and H.-Y.L. and C.-H.W. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.2004783117 |