The predictive value of the ages and stages questionnaire in late infancy for low average cognitive ability at age 5
Aim This retrospective, longitudinal study examined the predictive value of the ages and stages questionnaire (ASQ) in late infancy for identifying children who progressed to have low cognitive ability at 5 years of age. Methods The ASQ was performed on 755 participants from the Irish BASELINE birth...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta Paediatrica Vol. 111; no. 6; pp. 1194 - 1200 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Norway
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.06.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aim
This retrospective, longitudinal study examined the predictive value of the ages and stages questionnaire (ASQ) in late infancy for identifying children who progressed to have low cognitive ability at 5 years of age.
Methods
The ASQ was performed on 755 participants from the Irish BASELINE birth cohort at 24 or 27 months of age. Intelligence quotient was measured at age 5 with the Kaufmann Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition, and low cognitive ability was defined as a score more than 1 standard deviation below the mean. The ASQ’s predictive value was examined, together with other factors associated with low cognitive ability at 5 years.
Results
When the ASQ was performed at 24 or 27 months, the overall sensitivity for identifying low cognitive ability at 5 years was 20.8% and the specificity was 91.1%. Using a total score cut‐off point increased the sensitivity to 46.6% and 71.4% at 24 and 27 months, but specificity fell to 74.1% and 67.2%, respectively. After adjusting for ASQ performance, maternal education and family income were strongly associated with cognitive outcomes at 5 years.
Conclusion
The ASQ did not detect the majority of children with low cognitive ability at age 5. Alternative methods need investigation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information This work was performed within the Irish Clinical Academic Training (ICAT) Programme, supported by the Wellcome Trust and the Health Research Board (Grant Number 203930/B/16/Z), the Health Service Executive, National Doctors Training and Planning and the Health and Social Care, Research and Development Division, Northern Ireland. The funding body had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, or manuscript preparation. Open access funding provided by IReL. Correction added on 08 May 2022, after first online publication: IReL funding statement has been added. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This work was performed within the Irish Clinical Academic Training (ICAT) Programme, supported by the Wellcome Trust and the Health Research Board (Grant Number 203930/B/16/Z), the Health Service Executive, National Doctors Training and Planning and the Health and Social Care, Research and Development Division, Northern Ireland. The funding body had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, or manuscript preparation. Correction added on 14 May 2022, after first online publication: IReL funding statement has been added. |
ISSN: | 0803-5253 1651-2227 |
DOI: | 10.1111/apa.16309 |