The effects of pastoral intensification on the feeding interactions of generalist predators in streams

• Published in: Molecular ecology Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 590 - 602
• Main Authors: Pearson, C. E., Symondson, W. O. C., Clare, E. L., Ormerod, S. J., Iparraguirre Bolaños, E., Vaughan, I. P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2018; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: agriculture; Animals; Anthropogenic factors; Ants - physiology; Aquatic insects; Aquatic organisms; Aquatic Organisms - physiology; Biotic factors; Deoxyribonucleic acid; Diet; Dinocras cephalotes; DNA; DNA probes; Drainage; feeding interactions; Food Chain; Food chains; Food webs; freshwater; Insecta - physiology; Invertebrates; Invertebrates - physiology; Livestock; Livestock farming; Original; ORIGINAL ARTICLES; Predators; Predatory Behavior - physiology; Prey; Rhyacophila dorsalis; Rivers; Sedimentation; Specialization; Streams; Taxa; Trophic relationships; agriculture; predators; feeding interactions; freshwater; invertebrates
• ISSN: 0962-1083; 1365-294X
• DOI: 10.1111/mec.14459

Land‐use change can alter trophic interactions with wide‐ranging functional consequences, yet the consequences for aquatic food webs have been little studied. In part, this may reflect the challenges of resolving the diets of aquatic organisms using classical gut contents analysis, especially for soft‐bodied prey. We used next‐generation sequencing to resolve prey use in nearly 400 individuals of two predatory invertebrates (the Caddisfly, Rhyacophila dorsalis, and the Stonefly Dinocras cephalotes) in streams draining land with increasingly intensive livestock farming. Rhyacophila dorsalis occurred in all streams, whereas D. cephalotes was restricted to low intensities, allowing us to test whether: (i) apparent sensitivity to agriculture in the latter species reflects a more specialized diet and (ii) diet in R. dorsalis varied between sites with and without D. cephalotes. DNA was extracted from dissected gut contents, amplified without blocking probes and sequenced using Ion Torrent technology. Both predators were generalists, consuming 30 prey taxa with a preference for taxa that were abundant in all streams or that increased with intensification. Where both predators were present, their diets were nearly identical, and R. dorsalis's diet was virtually unchanged in the absence of D. cephalotes. The loss of D. cephalotes from more intensive sites was probably due to physicochemical stressors, such as sedimentation, rather than to dietary specialization, although wider biotic factors (e.g., competition with other predatory taxa) could not be excluded. This study provides a uniquely detailed description of predator diets along a land‐use intensity gradient, offering new insights into how anthropogenic stressors affect stream communities.