Transfusion of pathogen‐reduced platelet components without leukoreduction

BACKGROUND Leukoreduction (LR) of platelet concentrate (PC) has evolved as the standard to mitigate risks of alloimmunization, clinical refractoriness, acute transfusion reactions (ATRs), and cytomegalovirus infection, but does not prevent transfusion‐associated graft‐versus‐host disease (TA‐GVHD)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 59; no. 6; pp. 1953 - 1961
Main Authors Sim, Joycelyn, Tsoi, Wai Chiu, Lee, Cheuk Kwong, Leung, Rock, Lam, Clarence C. K., Koontz, Claudia, Liu, Amy Yingjie, Huang, Norman, Benjamin, Richard J, Vermeij, Hans J., Stassinopoulos, Adonis, Corash, Laurence, Lie, Albert K. W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.06.2019
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND Leukoreduction (LR) of platelet concentrate (PC) has evolved as the standard to mitigate risks of alloimmunization, clinical refractoriness, acute transfusion reactions (ATRs), and cytomegalovirus infection, but does not prevent transfusion‐associated graft‐versus‐host disease (TA‐GVHD). Amotosalen–ultraviolet A pathogen reduction (A‐PR) of PC reduces risk of transfusion‐transmitted infection and TA‐GVHD. In vitro data indicate that A‐PR effectively inactivates WBCs and infectious pathogens. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A sequential cohort study evaluated A‐PR without LR, gamma irradiation, and bacterial screening in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. The first cohort received conventional PC (control) processed without LR, but with gamma irradiation and bacterial screening. The second cohort received A‐PR PC (test) processed without: LR, bacterial screening, or gamma irradiation. The primary efficacy outcome was the 1‐hour corrected count increment. The primary safety outcome was treatment‐emergent ATR. Secondary outcomes included clinical refractoriness, and 100‐day status for engraftment, TA‐GVHD, HSCT‐GVHD, infections, and mortality. RESULTS Mean corrected count increment (× 103) of 33 test PC recipients was similar (18.9 ± 8.8 vs. 16.6 ± 8.4; p = 0.296) to that of 31 control PC recipients. Test recipients had a reduced, but nonsignificant, incidence of ATR (test = 9.1%, Control = 19.4%; p = 0.296). The frequencies of clinical refractoriness (0 of 33 vs. 4 of 31 patients) and refractory transfusions (6.6% vs. 19.3%) were lower in the test cohort (p = 0.05 and 0.02), respectively. No patient in either cohort had TA‐GVHD. Day 100 engraftment, HSCT‐GVHD, mortality, and infectious disease complications were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS This study indicated that A‐PR PC without LR, gamma irradiation, or bacterial screening is feasible for support of HSCT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0041-1132
1537-2995
DOI:10.1111/trf.15269