A 52‐week randomized controlled trial of ipragliflozin or sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes combined with metformin: The N‐ISM study

• Published in: Diabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 811 - 821
• Main Authors: Kitazawa, Masaru, Katagiri, Takashi, Suzuki, Hiromi, Matsunaga, Satoshi, H Yamada, Mayuko, Ikarashi, Tomoo, Yamamoto, Masahiko, Furukawa, Kazuo, Iwanaga, Midori, Hatta, Mariko, Fujihara, Kazuya, Yamada, Takaho, Tanaka, Shiro, Sone, Hirohito
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2021; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Antidiabetics; Arteriosclerosis; Body mass index; Body weight; Body weight gain; Cardiovascular diseases; Cholesterol; clinical trial; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent); Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV; DPP‐4 inhibitor; Glucose transporter; glycaemic control; Hemoglobin; Metformin; Original; Peptidase; randomized trial; Risk factors; SGLT2 inhibitor; sitagliptin; clinical trial; glycaemic control; sitagliptin; SGLT2 inhibitor; DPP-4 inhibitor; randomized trial
• ISSN: 1462-8902; 1463-1326
• DOI: 10.1111/dom.14288

Aim To compare the long‐term efficacy of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors as second‐line drugs after metformin for patients not at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Materials and methods In a 52‐week randomized open‐label trial, we compared ipragliflozin and sitagliptin in Japanese patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, without prior ASCVD and treated with metformin. The primary endpoint was a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction of ≥0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) without weight gain at 52 weeks. Results Of a total of 111 patients (mean age 59.2 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 26.6 kg/m2, 61.3% men), 54 patients received ipragliflozin and 57 received sitagliptin. After 52 weeks, achievement of the primary endpoint was not significantly different (37.0% and 40.3%; P = 0.72). HbA1c reduction rate at 24 weeks was greater for sitagliptin (56.1%) than for ipragliflozin (31.5%; P = 0.01). From 24 to 52 weeks, the HbA1c reduction with sitagliptin was attenuated, with no significant difference in HbA1c reduction after 52 weeks between sitagliptin (54.4%) and ipragliflozin (38.9%; P = 0.10). Improvements in BMI, C‐peptide and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were greater with ipragliflozin than with sitagliptin. Adverse events occurred in 17 patients with ipragliflozin and in 10 patients with sitagliptin (P = 0.11). Conclusion The HbA1c‐lowering effect at 24 weeks was greater with sitagliptin than with ipragliflozin, but with no difference in efficacy related to HbA1c and body weight at 52 weeks. However, some ASCVD risk factors improved with ipragliflozin.