Nutritional interventions in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy: Current practice at the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology centres

• Published in: European journal of cancer care Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. e13518 - n/a
• Main Authors: Kok, Annemieke, Lugt, Carlijn, Leermakers‐Vermeer, Marja J., Roos, Nicole M., Speksnijder, Caroline M., Bree, Remco
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Hindawi Limited 01.01.2022; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Body weight; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemotherapy; diet therapy; Dietitians; Energy requirements; Enteral Nutrition; Gastrostomy; Head & neck cancer; head and neck neoplasms; Head and Neck Neoplasms - therapy; Humans; Intubation, Gastrointestinal; Mathematical analysis; nutritional intervention; Oncology; Original; Ostomy; Patients; Radiation therapy; enteral nutrition; head and neck neoplasms; nutritional intervention; chemoradiotherapy; gastrostomy; diet therapy
• ISSN: 0961-5423; 1365-2354
• DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13518

Objective To assess variations in nutritional interventions during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) among the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology centres (HNOCs). Methods An online questionnaire about nutritional interventions and dietetic practices was sent to 14 oncology dietitians of the HNOCs. Results The response rate was 93%. The number of scheduled dietetic consultations varied from two to seven during CRT. Most centres (77%) reported using a gastrostomy for tube feeding in the majority of patients. Gastrostomies were placed prophylactically upon indication (39%) or in all patients (15%), reactive (15%), or both (31%). For calculating energy requirements, 54% of the dietitians used the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization and United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU) formula and 77% uses 1.2–1.5 g/kg body weight for calculating protein requirements. Almost half of the centres (46%) reported to remove the gastrostomy between 8 and 12 weeks after CR. Most centres (92%) reported to end dietary treatment within 6 months after CRT. Conclusion This study shows substantial variation in dietetic practice, especially in the use of a gastrostomy for tube feeding, between the HNOCs. There is a need for concise dietetic guidelines.