Critical factors in achieving fine‐scale functional MRI: Removing sources of inadvertent spatial smoothing

Ultra‐high Field (≥7T) functional magnetic resonance imaging (UHF‐fMRI) provides opportunities to resolve fine‐scale features of functional architecture such as cerebral cortical columns and layers, in vivo. While the nominal resolution of modern fMRI acquisitions may appear to be sufficient to reso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 43; no. 11; pp. 3311 - 3331
Main Authors Wang, Jianbao, Nasr, Shahin, Roe, Anna Wang, Polimeni, Jonathan R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ultra‐high Field (≥7T) functional magnetic resonance imaging (UHF‐fMRI) provides opportunities to resolve fine‐scale features of functional architecture such as cerebral cortical columns and layers, in vivo. While the nominal resolution of modern fMRI acquisitions may appear to be sufficient to resolve these features, several common data preprocessing steps can introduce unwanted spatial blurring, especially those that require interpolation of the data. These resolution losses can impede the detection of the fine‐scale features of interest. To examine quantitatively and systematically the sources of spatial resolution losses occurring during preprocessing, we used synthetic fMRI data and real fMRI data from the human visual cortex—the spatially interdigitated human V2 “thin” and “thick” stripes. The pattern of these cortical columns lies along the cortical surface and thus can be best appreciated using surface‐based fMRI analysis. We used this as a testbed for evaluating strategies that can reduce spatial blurring of fMRI data. Our results show that resolution losses can be mitigated at multiple points in preprocessing pathway. We show that unwanted blur is introduced at each step of volume transformation and surface projection, and can be ameliorated by replacing multi‐step transformations with equivalent single‐step transformations. Surprisingly, the simple approaches of volume upsampling and of cortical mesh refinement also helped to reduce resolution losses caused by interpolation. Volume upsampling also serves to improve motion estimation accuracy, which helps to reduce blur. Moreover, we demonstrate that the level of spatial blurring is nonuniform over the brain—knowledge which is critical for interpreting data in high‐resolution fMRI studies. Importantly, our study provides recommendations for reducing unwanted blurring during preprocessing as well as methods that enable quantitative comparisons between preprocessing strategies. These findings highlight several underappreciated sources of a spatial blur. Individually, the factors that contribute to spatial blur may appear to be minor, but in combination, the cumulative effects can hinder the interpretation of fine‐scale fMRI and the detectability of these fine‐scale features of functional architecture. In order to evaluate the strategies to reduce spatial resolution losses during fMRI data preprocessing for high resolution surface‐based columnar mapping, we quantified inadvertent blur using both synthetic fMRI data and real fMRI data from human visual cortex, the spatially interdigitated V2 “thin” and “thick” stripes. Results surprisingly show that the simple method of volume upsampling can effectively preserve spatial resolution, and we also highlight less well‐known sources of spatial nonuniform blur that are present during acquisition. These findings uncover several underappreciated sources of the spatial blur, which can hinder the interpretation of submillimeter fMRI and the detectability of these fine‐scale features of functional architecture.
Bibliography:Funding information
National Key R&D Program of China, Grant/Award Number: 2018YFA0701400; BRAIN Initiative/ NIH NIMH, Grant/Award Number: R01‐MH111419; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Grant/Award Number: 2019XZZX003‐20; Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province, Grant/Award Number: 2020C03004; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: U20A20221, 819611280292; NIH NEI, Grant/Award Numbers: R01‐EY026881, R01‐EY030434; NIH NIBIB, Grant/Award Numbers: P41‐EB030006, R01‐EB019437; NIH NIMH, Grant/Award Number: R01‐MH124004; NIH Shared Instrumentation, Grant/Award Number: S10‐RR019371; Program of China Scholarships Council, Grant/Award Number: 201906320397
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Funding information National Key R&D Program of China, Grant/Award Number: 2018YFA0701400; BRAIN Initiative/ NIH NIMH, Grant/Award Number: R01‐MH111419; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Grant/Award Number: 2019XZZX003‐20; Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province, Grant/Award Number: 2020C03004; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: U20A20221, 819611280292; NIH NEI, Grant/Award Numbers: R01‐EY026881, R01‐EY030434; NIH NIBIB, Grant/Award Numbers: P41‐EB030006, R01‐EB019437; NIH NIMH, Grant/Award Number: R01‐MH124004; NIH Shared Instrumentation, Grant/Award Number: S10‐RR019371; Program of China Scholarships Council, Grant/Award Number: 201906320397
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.25867