Diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with persistent allergic asthma using three different diagnostic algorithms
Background Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) has been reported in various degrees among patients with persistent allergic asthma (PAA). Currently, there is no gold standard approach for diagnosis of ABPA. Objectives In the current study, we aimed the evaluation of three different mainly...
Saved in:
Published in | Mycoses Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 272 - 281 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.03.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) has been reported in various degrees among patients with persistent allergic asthma (PAA). Currently, there is no gold standard approach for diagnosis of ABPA.
Objectives
In the current study, we aimed the evaluation of three different mainly used algorithms as Rosenberg & Patterson (A), ISHAM Working Group (B) and Greenberger (C) for diagnosis of ABPA in 200 patients with underlying PAA.
Methods
All patients were evaluated using Aspergillus skin prick test (SPTAf), Aspergillus‐specific IgE (sIgEAf) and IgG (sIgGAf), total IgE (tIgE), pulmonary function tests, radiological findings and peripheral blood eosinophil count. The prevalence rate of ABPA in PAA patients was estimated by three diagnostic criteria. We used Latent Class Analysis for the evaluation of different diagnostic parameters in different applied ABPA diagnostic algorithms.
Results
Aspergillus sensitisation was observed in 30 (15.0%) patients. According to algorithms A, B and C, nine (4.5%), six (3.0%) and 11 (5.5%) of patients were diagnosed with ABPA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of criteria B and C were (55.6% and 99.5%) and (100.0% and 98.9%) respectively. sIgEAf and sIgGAf showed the high significant sensitivity. The performance of algorithm A, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, was somewhat better than algorithm B.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated that the sensitivity of different diagnostic algorithms could change the prevalence rate of ABPA. We also found that all of three criteria resulted an adequate specificity for ABPA diagnosis. A consensus patterns combining elements of all three criteria may warrant a better diagnostic algorithm. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION V.M. and S. S. contributed to acquisition of data, draft the article and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work related to its accuracy or integrity. S.A.M, M. S. M., M. P., M. H., P. M. and Z. P. contributed to acquisition of clinical data, agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work related to its accuracy or integrity and reviewed the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. J. Y. C and N. B. contributed to analysis and interpretation of data and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work related to its accuracy or integrity. M.T.H. and S. S. made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study, given final approval of the version to be published and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work related to its accuracy or integrity. |
ISSN: | 0933-7407 1439-0507 |
DOI: | 10.1111/myc.13217 |