Characterization of whole‐brain task‐modulated functional connectivity in response to nociceptive pain: A multisensory comparison study

Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that brain responses to nociceptive pain, non‐nociceptive somatosensory, visual, and auditory stimuli are extremely similar. Actually, perception of external sensory stimulation requires complex interactions among distributed c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 1061 - 1075
Main Authors Li, Linling, Di, Xin, Zhang, Huijuan, Huang, Gan, Zhang, Li, Liang, Zhen, Zhang, Zhiguo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 15.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that brain responses to nociceptive pain, non‐nociceptive somatosensory, visual, and auditory stimuli are extremely similar. Actually, perception of external sensory stimulation requires complex interactions among distributed cortical and subcortical brain regions. However, the interactions among these regions elicited by nociceptive pain remain unclear, which limits our understanding of mechanisms of pain from a brain network perspective. Task fMRI data were collected with a random sequence of intermixed stimuli of four sensory modalities in 80 healthy subjects. Whole‐brain psychophysiological interaction analysis was performed to identify task‐modulated functional connectivity (FC) patterns for each modality. Task‐modulated FC strength and graph‐theoretical‐based network properties were compared among the four modalities. Lastly, we performed across‐sensory‐modality prediction analysis based on the whole‐brain task‐modulated FC patterns to confirm the specific relationship between brain patterns and sensory modalities. For each sensory modality, task‐modulated FC patterns were distributed over widespread brain regions beyond those typically activated or deactivated during the stimulation. As compared with the other three sensory modalities, nociceptive stimulation exhibited significantly different patterns (more widespread and stronger FC within the cingulo‐opercular network, between cingulo‐opercular and sensorimotor networks, between cingulo‐opercular and emotional networks, and between default mode and emotional networks) and global property (smaller modularity). Further, a cross‐sensory‐modality prediction analysis found that task‐modulated FC patterns could predict sensory modality at the subject level successfully. Collectively, these results demonstrated that the whole‐brain task‐modulated FC is preferentially modulated by pain, thus providing new insights into the neural mechanisms of pain processing. This study aimed to reveal whether nociceptive pain could elicit different task‐modulated functional connectivity (FC) patterns from other sensory modalities (non‐nociceptive somatosensory, visual, and auditory). According to the results, nociceptive stimulation exhibited significantly different regional and global task‐modulated FC features from those of the other three sensory modalities, and the task‐modulated FC patterns were predictive of sensory modality at the subject level. These results could provide new insights from the perceptive of task‐modulated brain network into the neural mechanisms of pain processing.
Bibliography:Funding information
National Natural Science Foundation of China , Grant/Award Numbers: 81901831, 81871443; Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China, Grant/Award Number: 2021A1515011152; Shenzhen‐Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science‐Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions, Grant/Award Number: 2021SHIBS0003
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Funding information National Natural Science Foundation of China , Grant/Award Numbers: 81901831, 81871443; Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China, Grant/Award Number: 2021A1515011152; Shenzhen‐Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science‐Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions, Grant/Award Number: 2021SHIBS0003
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.25707