Reliability of bedside ultrasound of limb and diaphragm muscle thickness in critically ill children
ABSTRACT Introduction: We evaluated the reliability of measuring muscle thickness with ultrasound in limbs and diaphragms of critically ill children and determined the sensitivity of these measures to quantitate muscle atrophy over time. Methods: An expert and trained novice sonographers prospective...
Saved in:
Published in | Muscle & nerve Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 88 - 94 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.01.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Introduction: We evaluated the reliability of measuring muscle thickness with ultrasound in limbs and diaphragms of critically ill children and determined the sensitivity of these measures to quantitate muscle atrophy over time. Methods: An expert and trained novice sonographers prospectively measured limb and diaphragm muscle thickness in 33 critically ill children. Results: Expert and novice intrarater and interrater reliability were similar. Intraclass correlations (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CoV) were better in limbs (ICC > 0.9; CoV 3.57%–5.40%) than in diaphragm (ICC > 0.8; CoV novice 11.88%, expert, 12.28%). Mean relative difference in all muscles was small (1%‐8%). Limits of agreement of the relative difference were smaller in limb (<13%–18%) than in diaphragm (<38%) muscles. Discussion: Muscle thickness is reliably measured with ultrasound by trained examiners in critically ill children. Our approach detects atrophy >13% in limb and >38% in diaphragm muscles. The smaller detectable change in limb muscles is likely due to their greater thickness. Muscle Nerve 59:88–94, 2019 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Research reported in this work was supported by the Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (Grant UL1 TR000448) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH. Conflicts of Interest Funding None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0148-639X 1097-4598 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mus.26327 |