Health impacts of a scale‐up of supervised injection services in a Canadian setting: an interrupted time series analysis

Background and Aims In response to a dramatic rise in overdose deaths due to injection drug use, there was a rapid scale‐up of low‐threshold supervised injection services (SIS), termed ‘overdose prevention sites’ (OPS), in Vancouver, Canada in December 2016. We measured the potential impact of this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAddiction (Abingdon, England) Vol. 117; no. 4; pp. 986 - 997
Main Authors Kennedy, Mary Clare, Hayashi, Kanna, Milloy, M‐J, Compton, Miranda, Kerr, Thomas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Aims In response to a dramatic rise in overdose deaths due to injection drug use, there was a rapid scale‐up of low‐threshold supervised injection services (SIS), termed ‘overdose prevention sites’ (OPS), in Vancouver, Canada in December 2016. We measured the potential impact of this intervention on SIS use and related health outcomes among people who inject drugs (PWID). Design Segmented regression analyses of interrupted time series data from two community‐recruited prospective cohorts of PWID from January 2015 to November 2018 were used to measure the impact of the OPS scale‐up on changes in SIS use, public injection, syringe sharing and addiction treatment participation, controlling for pre‐existing secular trends. Setting Vancouver, Canada. Participants Of 745 PWID, 292 (39.7%) were women, 441 (59.6%) self‐reported white ancestry and the median age was 47 years (interquartile range = 38, 53) at baseline. Measurements Immediate (i.e. step level) and gradual (i.e. slope) changes in the monthly proportion of participants who self‐reported past 6‐month SIS use, public injection, syringe sharing and participation in any form of addiction treatment. Findings Post OPS expansion, the monthly prevalence of SIS use immediately increased by an estimated 6.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7, 11.2] and subsequently further increased by an estimated 0.7% (95% CI = 0.3, 1.1) per month. The monthly prevalence of addiction treatment participation immediately increased by an estimated 4.5% (95% CI = 0.5, 8.5) following the OPS expansion, while public injection and syringe sharing were estimated to immediately decrease by 5.5% (95% CI = 0.9, 10.0) and 2.5% (95% CI = 0.5, 4.6), respectively. Findings were inconclusive as to whether or not an association was present between the intervention and subsequent gradual changes in public injection, syringe sharing and addiction treatment participation. Conclusions Scaling‐up overdose prevention sites in Vancouver, Canada in December 2016 was associated with immediate and continued gradual increases in supervised injection service engagement and immediate increases in related health benefits.
Bibliography:Funding information
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Grant/Award Numbers: 20R74326, MSH‐141971; Canopy Growth; Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research; National Institute on Drug Abuse, Grant/Award Number: U01DA021525; National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: U01DA038886; NG Biomed Ltd; St. Paul's Foundation
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Mary Clare Kennedy: Conceptualization; formal analysis; methodology; writing-original draft preparation; writing-review & editing. Kanna Hayashi: Funding acquisition; investigation; project administration; writing-review & editing. M-J Milloy: Funding acquisition; investigation; project administration; writing-review & editing. Miranda Compton: writing-review & editing. Thomas Kerr: Funding acquisition; investigation; project administration; supervision; writing-review & editing.
ISSN:0965-2140
1360-0443
DOI:10.1111/add.15717