An Update on Foot and Ankle Fellowship Website Content and Accessibility

Background: The content and accessibility of foot and ankle fellowship websites impact applicants and fellowship programs. This study aimed to evaluate the accessibility provided via the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) websites and individual websites. Methods: The AOFAS websit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFoot & ankle orthopaedics Vol. 5; no. 1; p. 2473011420912957
Main Authors Khwaja, Ansab, Du, Peter, Sherman, Nathan, Truchan, Lisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 2020
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Ankle
Web sites
website
education
foot and ankle
fellowship
accessibility
content
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: The content and accessibility of foot and ankle fellowship websites impact applicants and fellowship programs. This study aimed to evaluate the accessibility provided via the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) websites and individual websites. Methods: The AOFAS website was used to identify existing foot and ankle fellowship programs. The database information was reviewed for links to fellowship program websites, which was corroborated through a Google search for accessibility. Information from fellowship program websites and the AOFAS was analyzed for the presence of recruitment and educational content, and this analysis was compared to previously reported metrics. Results: Forty-eight orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship programs were identified. The AOFAS database featured direct links to 19 (40%) fellowship websites with the Google search providing direct links to 35 (73%) websites. Foot and ankle fellowship information markedly improved in domains of Salary/Benefits (+233%), Rotations/Curriculum (+199%), and Faculty Listing (+67%), but there was a reduction in available content in the domains of Operative Experience (–79%), Office/Clinic information (–78%), and Didactics (–39%) compared with the lone existing study. Conclusion: There continues to be variability between foot and ankle fellowship websites and the AOFAS website regarding program content and descriptions. Some information is more readily available, but other domains have less information now than in previously reported research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2473-0114
2473-0114
DOI:10.1177/2473011420912957