Bosentan Treatment Is Associated With Improvement of Right Ventricular Function and Remodeling in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Background Medical pretreatment before pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) can optimize right ventricular (RV) function and may improve postoperative outcome in high‐risk patients. Using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), we determined whether the dual endothelin‐1 antagonist bosentan improves RV...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) Vol. 36; no. 11; pp. 698 - 703
Main Authors Surie, Sulaiman, Reesink, Herre J., Marcus, J. Tim, van der Plas, Mart N., Kloek, Jaap J., Vonk‐Noordegraaf, Anton, Bresser, Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.11.2013
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Medical pretreatment before pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) can optimize right ventricular (RV) function and may improve postoperative outcome in high‐risk patients. Using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), we determined whether the dual endothelin‐1 antagonist bosentan improves RV function and remodeling in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who waited for PEA. Hypothesis We hypothesized that medical therapy prior to PEA will be associated with improvements in RV remodeling and function. Methods In this pilot study, 15 operable CTEPH patients were randomly assigned to either bosentan (n = 8) or no bosentan (n = 7, control) for 16 weeks, next to “best standard of care.” Both before and after treatment, RV stroke volume index (RVSVI), RV ejection fraction (RVEF), RV mass, RV isovolumic relaxation time (rIVRT), leftward ventricular septal bowing (LVSB), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were determined using cMRI. Results After 16 weeks, the change (Δ) from baseline (median [range]) in the studied cMRI parameters differed significantly between the bosentan group and the controls: Δ RVSVI: 6 [−4–11] vs 1 [−6–3] mL/m−2; Δ RVEF: 8 [−10–15] vs −4 [−7–5]%; Δ RV mass: −3 [−6–−2] vs 2 [−1–3] g/m−2; Δ rIVRT: −30 [−130–20] vs 10 [−30–30] msec; Δ LVSB: 0.03 [−0.03–0.13] vs −0.03[−0.08–0.04] cm−1; and Δ LVEF: 8 [−5–17] vs −2 [−14–2]% (all P < 0.05). The change from baseline in mean pulmonary artery pressure (−11 [−17–11] vs 5 [−6–21] mm Hg, P < 0.05) and 6‐minute walk distance (20 [3–88] vs −4 [−40–40] m, P < 0.05) also differed significantly. Conclusions In CTEPH, compared with control, treatment with bosentan for 16 weeks was associated with a significant improvement in cMRI parameters of RV function and remodelling.
Bibliography:The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Sulaiman Surie, MD, and Herre J. Reesink, MD, received a nonrestricted research grant from Actelion Pharmaceuticals BV, Woerden, the Netherlands. The authors had full control of the design of the study, methods used, outcome parameters, analysis of data, and production of the written report.
ISSN:0160-9289
1932-8737
DOI:10.1002/clc.22197