Peripheral CD5+ B Cells in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
Objective CD5+ B cells have been conceptualized as a possible surrogate for Breg cells. The aim of the present study was to determine the utility of CD5+ B cells as biomarkers in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). Methods The absolute and relative numbers (percentages)...
Saved in:
Published in | Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) Vol. 67; no. 2; pp. 535 - 544 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.02.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
CD5+ B cells have been conceptualized as a possible surrogate for Breg cells. The aim of the present study was to determine the utility of CD5+ B cells as biomarkers in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV).
Methods
The absolute and relative numbers (percentages) of CD5+ B cells (explanatory variables) were measured longitudinally during 18 months in 197 patients randomized to receive either rituximab (RTX) or cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) for the treatment of AAV (Rituximab in ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis [RAVE] trial). Outcome variables included disease activity (status of active disease versus complete remission), responsiveness to induction therapy, disease relapse, disease severity, and, in RTX‐treated patients, relapse‐free survival according to the percentage of CD5+ B cells detected upon B cell repopulation.
Results
CD5+ B cell numbers were comparable between the treatment groups at baseline. After an initial decline, absolute CD5+ B cell numbers progressively increased in patients in the RTX treatment arm, but remained low in CYC/AZA‐treated patients. In both groups, the percentage of CD5+ B cells increased during remission induction and slowly declined thereafter. During relapse, the percentage of CD5+ B cells correlated inversely with disease activity in RTX‐treated patients, but not in patients who received CYC/AZA. No significant association was observed between the numbers of CD5+ B cells and induction treatment failure or disease severity. The dynamics of the CD5+ B cell compartment did not anticipate disease relapse. Following B cell repopulation, the percentage of CD5+ B cells was not predictive of time to flare in RTX‐treated patients.
Conclusion
The percentage of peripheral CD5+ B cells might reflect disease activity in RTX‐treated patients. However, sole staining for CD5 as a putative surrogate marker for Breg cells did not identify a subpopulation of B cells with clear potential for meaningful clinical use. Adequate phenotyping of Breg cells is required to further explore the value of these cells as biomarkers in AAV. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Dr. Kallenberg has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, MedImmune, and ChemoCentyx (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Stone has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Genentech and Roche (less than $10,000 each). The data in this study are from the Rituximab in ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) trial, which was performed as a project of the Immune Tolerance Network (NIH contract N01‐AI‐15416), an international clinical research consortium headquartered at the Benaroya Research Institute and supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH. Dr. Spiera has served as an investigator in clinical trials funded by Roche and Genentech. Dr. Miloslavsky has received honoraria for Advisory Board service from Genentech (less than $10,000). Dr. Langford has participated in clinical trials at the Cleveland Clinic that were funded by Genentech. |
ISSN: | 2326-5191 2326-5205 |
DOI: | 10.1002/art.38916 |