PediCARE: Development of a poverty‐targeted intervention for pediatric cancer

Background Poverty is associated with inferior psychosocial outcomes, higher rates of relapse, and decreased overall survival in children with cancer. Despite this, there are few evidence‐based, poverty‐targeted interventions and none specific to pediatric oncology. To address this gap, we developed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric blood & cancer Vol. 68; no. 10; pp. e29195 - n/a
Main Authors Umaretiya, Puja J., Revette, Anna, Seo, Anna, Flamand, Yael, Ilcisin, Lenka, Zheng, Daniel J., Bhatia, Smita, Wolfe, Joanne, Bona, Kira
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Poverty is associated with inferior psychosocial outcomes, higher rates of relapse, and decreased overall survival in children with cancer. Despite this, there are few evidence‐based, poverty‐targeted interventions and none specific to pediatric oncology. To address this gap, we developed and refined the Pediatric Cancer Resource Equity (PediCARE) intervention, a household material hardship (HMH) targeted intervention providing transportation and groceries to pediatric oncology families. Methods This was a single‐arm pilot study conducted at a single, large, tertiary pediatric cancer center. Newly diagnosed patients with HMH‐exposure were directly assigned to receive PediCARE for a total of three months. Quantitative and qualitative approaches were used to evaluate its acceptability and to rapidly refine the intervention. Results Nine families (100% of those approached) consented to enrollment with no attrition over the three‐month study period. Families were highly satisfied with the intervention and recommended participation to others. All of the families utilized the grocery delivery component of PediCARE, and seven utilized the transportation component. Qualitative participant feedback was used to rapidly refine the intervention including logistics of intervention delivery, and dose of intervention components. Conclusion PediCARE, a poverty‐targeted intervention, was highly acceptable to pediatric oncology families. The intervention was refined in real‐time utilizing quantitative and qualitative feedback. Next steps include intervention evaluation in a randomized, controlled feasibility study.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1545-5009
1545-5017
DOI:10.1002/pbc.29195