Whole blood FPR1 mRNA expression predicts both non‐small cell and small cell lung cancer

While long‐term survival rates for early‐stage lung cancer are high, most cases are diagnosed in later stages that can negatively impact survival rates. We aim to design a simple, single biomarker blood test for early‐stage lung cancer that is robust to preclinical variables and can be readily imple...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of cancer Vol. 142; no. 11; pp. 2355 - 2362
Main Authors Morris, Scott, Vachani, Anil, Pass, Harvey I., Rom, William N., Ryden, Kirk, Weiss, Glen J., Hogarth, D. K., Runger, George, Richards, Donald, Shelton, Troy, Mallery, David W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2018
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While long‐term survival rates for early‐stage lung cancer are high, most cases are diagnosed in later stages that can negatively impact survival rates. We aim to design a simple, single biomarker blood test for early‐stage lung cancer that is robust to preclinical variables and can be readily implemented in the clinic. Whole blood was collected in PAXgene tubes from a training set of 29 patients, and a validation set of 260 patients, of which samples from 58 patients were prospectively collected in a clinical trial specifically for our study. After RNA was extracted, the expressions of FPR1 and a reference gene were quantified by an automated one‐step Taqman RT‐PCR assay. Elevated levels of FPR1 mRNA in whole blood predicted lung cancer status with a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 87% on all validation specimens. The prospectively collected specimens had a significantly higher 68% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Results from patients with benign nodules were similar to healthy volunteers. No meaningful correlation was present between our test results and any clinical characteristic other than lung cancer diagnosis. FPR1 mRNA levels in whole blood can predict the presence of lung cancer. Using this as a reflex test for positive lung cancer screening computed tomography scans has the potential to increase the positive predictive value. This marker can be easily measured in an automated process utilizing off‐the‐shelf equipment and reagents. Further work is justified to explain the source of this biomarker. What's new? There have been several lung cancer screening trials evaluating the potential benefit of imaging for improving survival outcomes in lung cancer patients. While low‐dose computed tomography (CT) screening reduces mortality, it yields a 96.4% false‐positive rate. A potential strategy to improve screening may be the identification of additional tools that improve identification of false positives. Using prospectively collected whole blood samples, here the authors show that elevated FPR1 mRNA expression has a 68% sensitivity and 89% specificity. This single biomarker blood test, which can be readily implemented in the clinic, may increase the positive predictive value of detecting lung cancer.
Bibliography:Conflict of interest
Dr. Morris reports stock and personal fees from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and stock from Paradigm Diagnostics, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Morris has a patent PCT/US2013/020383 issued. Dr. Vachani reports grants from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; grants from Jannsen Research and Development, grants from MagArray, Inc, grants from Integrated Diagnostics, grants from Veracyte, Inc, outside the submitted work. Dr. Pass and Dr. Rom report grants from Viomics, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Weiss reports other from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Paradigm, personal fees from Medscape, personal fees from Blend Therapeutics, personal fees from Pharmatech, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from IDEA Pharma, personal fees from Ignyta, personal fees from GLG Council, personal fees and ownership interest from Circulogene Theranostics, has received travel reimbursement from NantWorks, has received travel reimbursement from Cambridge HealthTech Institute, has received travel reimbursement from Tesaro; and has a patent for methods and kits to predict prognostic and therapeutic outcome in SCLC issued, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hogarth has served in an advising capacity to Viomics and has received stock options as compensation, during the conduct of the study. Mr. Shelton reports stock and personnel fees from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and stock from Paradigm Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. David Mallery report stock from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and stock from Paradigm Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. Mr. Mallery has a patent PCT/US2013/020383 issued. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conflict of interest: Dr. Morris reports stock and personal fees from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and stock from Paradigm Diagnostics, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Morris has a patent PCT/US2013/020383 issued. Dr. Vachani reports grants from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; grants from Jannsen Research and Development, grants from MagArray, Inc, grants from Integrated Diagnostics, grants from Veracyte, Inc, outside the submitted work. Dr. Pass and Dr. Rom report grants from Viomics, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Weiss reports other from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Paradigm, personal fees from Medscape, personal fees from Blend Therapeutics, personal fees from Pharmatech, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from IDEA Pharma, personal fees from Ignyta, personal fees from GLG Council, personal fees and ownership interest from Circulogene Theranostics, has received travel reimbursement from NantWorks, has received travel reimbursement from Cambridge HealthTech Institute, has received travel reimbursement from Tesaro; and has a patent for methods and kits to predict prognostic and therapeutic outcome in SCLC issued, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hogarth has served in an advising capacity to Viomics and has received stock options as compensation, during the conduct of the study. Mr. Shelton reports stock and personnel fees from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and stock from Paradigm Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. David Mallery report stock from Viomics, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and stock from Paradigm Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. Mr. Mallery has a patent PCT/US2013/020383 issued. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/ijc.31245