Meta‐analysis of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Results of 3 Phase 1 Studies with Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim

• Published in: Clinical pharmacology in drug development Vol. 10; no. 10; pp. 1130 - 1141
• Main Authors: Gattu, Sreekanth, Wang, Jessie, Bellon, Anne, Schelcher, Celine, Nakov, Roumen, Arani, Ramin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2021; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Biological products; biosimilar; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic - methods; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Filgrastim - pharmacokinetics; granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor; Humans; Male; Meta-analysis; Middle Aged; neutropenia; Neutrophils; Original Manuscript; pegfilgrastim; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods; Young Adult; United States > US; neutropenia; pegfilgrastim; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; biosimilar
• ISSN: 2160-763X; 2160-7648
• DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1005

A meta‐analysis using data from 3 phase 1 studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Sandoz biosimilar versus US‐ and EU‐reference pegfilgrastim. The studies included a single‐dose, double‐blind, 3‐arm, parallel‐group study (study 1); a single‐dose, double‐blind, 2‐way crossover study (study 2); and a single‐dose, double‐blind, 3‐way, 6‐sequence crossover study (study 3). Healthy male and female subjects were randomized to receive the proposed biosimilar (all studies), US‐reference biologic (studies 1 and 3), or EU‐reference biologic (studies 1, 2, and 3). For PK parameters (area under the serum concentration–time curve from time of dosing and extrapolated to infinity, area under the serum concentration–time curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration, and maximum observed serum concentration) and PD parameters (absolute neutrophil count area under the effect curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration and maximum measured absolute neutrophil count) geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for treatment comparisons were calculated using the meta‐analysis approach with a fixed‐effects model. PK/PD biosimilarity was concluded if the 90%CIs were within the equivalence margins of 0.80 to 1.25. The 90%CIs for the geometric mean ratios for the PK/PD parameters were all within the equivalence margins. Safety and tolerability were similar between the proposed biosimilar and the US‐ and EU‐reference pegfilgrastim in healthy subjects. This meta‐analysis of 3 phase 1 studies supports PK/PD similarity of Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim to US‐ and EU‐reference pegfilgrastim. No clinically meaningful differences in safety or tolerability were observed.