Multicenter neonatal databases: Trends in research uses

• Published in: BMC research notes Vol. 10; no. 1; p. 42
• Main Authors: Creel, Liza M, Gregory, Sean, McNeal, Catherine J, Beeram, Madhava R, Krauss, David R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 13.01.2017; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Advisors; Analysis; Babies; Birth weight; Births; Childrens health; Collaboration; Data collection; Database Management Systems; Datasets; Health aspects; Humans; Infant mortality; Infant, Newborn; Information management; Intensive care; Low birth weight; Morbidity; Neonatal intensive care; Patient outcomes; Premature infants; Quality; Studies; Trends; Ventilation; United States; United States > US; NICU databases; NICU outcomes; Pediatrics outcomes; Prematurity
• ISSN: 1756-0500; 1756-0500
• DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2336-4

In the US, approximately 12.7% of all live births are preterm, 8.2% of live births were low birth weight (LBW), and 1.5% are very low birth weight (VLBW). Although technological advances have improved mortality rates among preterm and LBW infants, improving overall rates of prematurity and LBW remains a national priority. Monitoring short- and long-term outcomes is critical for advancing medical treatment and minimizing morbidities associated with prematurity or LBW; however, studying these infants can be challenging. Several large, multi-center neonatal databases have been developed to improve research and quality improvement of treatments for and outcomes of premature and LBW infants. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe three multi-center neonatal databases. We conducted a literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar over the period 1990 to August 2014. Studies were included in our review if one of the databases was used as a primary source of data or comparison. Included studies were categorized by year of publication; study design employed, and research focus. A total of 343 studies published between 1991 and 2014 were included. Studies of premature and LBW infants using these databases have increased over time, and provide evidence for both neonatology and community-based pediatric practice. Research into treatment and outcomes of premature and LBW infants is expanding, partially due to the availability of large, multicenter databases. The consistency of clinical conditions and neonatal outcomes studied since 1990 demonstrates that there are dedicated research agendas and resources that allow for long-term, and potentially replicable, studies within this population.