Mixed methods student evaluation of an online systemic human anatomy course with laboratory

• Published in: Anatomical sciences education Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 272 - 285
• Main Authors: Attardi, Stefanie M., Choi, Suwhan, Barnett, John, Rogers, Kem A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 06.05.2016; Wiley-Blackwell; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Anatomy; Anatomy - education; Classroom Environment; computer assisted instruction; Computer Software; Cross-Over Studies; Experiential Learning; gross anatomy education; Human Body; Humans; Interaction; Interviews; Interviews as Topic; Laboratories; Learning; Lecture Method; Medical Education; Mixed Methods Research; Online Courses; online distance education; online laboratory; online lecture; Online Systems; Simulated Environment; Student Attitudes; Student Evaluation; student perception; Students, Medical - psychology; Surveys; systemic human anatomy; Teacher Student Relationship; Teaching Methods; Technology Uses in Education; undergraduate education; Virtual Classrooms; online distance education; gross anatomy education; student perception; undergraduate education; systemic human anatomy; online laboratory; computer assisted instruction; online lecture
• ISSN: 1935-9772; 1935-9780
• DOI: 10.1002/ase.1584

A fully online section of an existing face‐to‐face (F2F) systemic human anatomy course with a prosection laboratory was offered for the first time in 2012–2013. Lectures for F2F students (N = 365) were broadcast in both live and archived format to online students (N = 40) using virtual classroom software. Laboratories were delivered online by a teaching assistant who manipulated 3D computer models in the virtual classroom environment. An exploratory sequential mixed methods approach was undertaken to determine the most important deciding factors that drive students’ preferences for a given format and then to generate theory on the strengths and weaknesses of the online format. Students (20 online; 310 F2F) volunteered to participate in a crossover period of one week to expose them to the course section in which they were not originally registered. Open ended interviews (20 online; 20 F2F) and quantitative surveys (270 F2F) were conducted following a crossover. Students valued pace control, schedule, and location flexibility of learning from archived materials and being assessed online. In the online laboratory they had difficulty using the 3D models and preferred the unique and hands‐on experiences of cadaveric specimens. The F2F environment was conducive to learning in both lecture and laboratory because students felt more engaged by instructors in person and were less distracted by their surroundings. These results suggest the need to improve the online experience by increasing the quality of student–instructor communication and in turn student–content interaction with the 3D models. Anat Sci Educ 9: 272–285. © 2015 American Association of Anatomists.