Validation of the risk stratification newly defined in the Japanese Urological Association guidelines 2019 for non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: A multi‐institutional collaborative study

• Published in: International journal of urology Vol. 30; no. 5; pp. 473 - 481
• Main Authors: Miyamoto, Tatsuki, Miyake, Makito, Nakahama, Tomonori, Nishimura, Nobutaka, Onishi, Kenta, Iida, Kouta, Yonemori, Masaya, Enokida, Hideki, Nakagawa, Masayuki, Matsumoto, Hiroaki, Matsuyama, Hideyasu, Matsushita, Yuto, Miyake, Hideaki, Fujii, Tomomi, Shimada, Keiji, Baba, Satoshi, Kinjyo, Mitsuru, Shimokama, Tatsuro, Okumura, Koji, Fujimoto, Kiyohide
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Australia Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.05.2023
• Subjects: Aged; Bladder cancer; Cancer; Disease Progression; East Asian People; European Association of Urology; Humans; intermediate risk; Invasiveness; Japanese Urological Association; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control; Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms; non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk factors; Risk groups; risk stratification; Survival; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology; non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; Japanese Urological Association; intermediate risk; risk stratification; European Association of Urology
• ISSN: 0919-8172; 1442-2042
• DOI: 10.1111/iju.15162

Objectives To validate the risk stratification newly defined in the Japanese Urological Association guidelines 2019 for non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer and provide a more accurate stratification model for a heterogeneous intermediate‐risk group. Methods A total of 1610 patients, who underwent transurethral resection, diagnosed with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer in nine collaborating hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. They were classified into low‐risk, intermediate‐risk, high‐risk, and highest‐risk groups, and recurrence‐free survival, progression‐free survival, cancer‐specific survival, and overall survival were compared among the groups. The intermediate‐risk group was subdivided into two groups based on the multivariable Cox regression model of recurrence and progression risk factors, and a revised risk model was created. Results The progression‐free survival, cancer‐specific survival, and overall survival were well stratified, while the recurrence‐free survival of the intermediate‐risk group was the shortest among the four groups (p < 0.001). The independent risk factors for recurrence and progression‐free survival in the intermediate‐risk group were as follows: age ≥ 70 years, sex, multiple tumors, tumor size ≥3 cm, and recurrent cases. The intermediate‐risk group was subdivided into two groups: favorable intermediate‐risk group and unfavorable intermediate‐risk group. The revised risk model showed significant differences. Conclusion We validated the Japanese Urological Association guidelines 2019 stratification model. The revised risk model provided a more accurate treatment selection for this disease subset.