The hazard of (sub)therapeutic doses of anticoagulants in non‐critically ill patients with Covid‐19: The Padua province experience

Background Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is responsible for a worldwide pandemic, with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The increasing evidence of an associated relevant prothrombotic coagulopathy has resulted in an increasing use of antithrombotic doses higher than usual in COVID‐19 pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis Vol. 18; no. 10; pp. 2629 - 2635
Main Authors Pesavento, Raffaele, Ceccato, Davide, Pasquetto, Giampaolo, Monticelli, Jacopo, Leone, Lucia, Frigo, Annachiara, Gorgi, Davide, Postal, Anna, Marchese, Giuseppe Maria, Cipriani, Alberto, Saller, Alois, Sarais, Cristiano, Criveller, Pietro, Gemelli, Marco, Capone, Federico, Fioretto, Paola, Pagano, Claudio, Rossato, Marco, Avogaro, Angelo, Simioni, Paolo, Prandoni, Paolo, Vettor, Roberto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Limited 01.10.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is responsible for a worldwide pandemic, with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The increasing evidence of an associated relevant prothrombotic coagulopathy has resulted in an increasing use of antithrombotic doses higher than usual in COVID‐19 patients. Information on the benefit/risk ratio of this approach is still lacking. Objective To assess the incidence of relevant bleeding complications in association with the antithrombotic strategy and its relationship with the amount of drug. Methods Consecutive COVID‐19 patients admitted between February and April 2020 were included in a retrospective analysis. Major bleedings (MB) and clinically relevant non‐major bleeding (CRNMB) were obtained from patient medical records and were adjudicated by an independent committee. Results Of the 324 patients who were recruited, 240 had been treated with prophylactic doses and 84 with higher doses of anticoagulants. The rate of the composite endpoint of MB or CRNMB was 6.9 per 100‐person/months in patients who had been given prophylactic doses, and 26.4 per 100‐person/months in those who had been prescribed higher doses (hazard ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.90‐7.97). The corresponding rates for overall mortality were 12.2 and 20.1 per 100‐person/months, respectively. Conclusions The rate of relevant bleeding events was high in patients treated with (sub)therapeutic doses of anticoagulants. In the latter group, overall mortality did not differ from that of patients treated with standard prophylactic doses and was even higher. Our result does not support a strategy of giving (sub)therapeutic doses of anticoagulants in non‐critically ill patients with COVID‐19.
Bibliography:Manuscript handled by: Sabine Eichinger
R.P. and D.C. are joint co‐first authors.
P.P. and R.V. are joint co‐senior authors.
Final decision: Sabine Eichinger, 15 July 2020
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/jth.15022