Prediction of Survival Among Patients Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Response‐Based Approach

Background and Aims The heterogeneity of intermediate‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the widespread use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) outside recommended guidelines have encouraged the development of scoring systems that predict patient survival. The aim of this study was to bu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 198 - 212
Main Authors Han, Guohong, Berhane, Sarah, Toyoda, Hidenori, Bettinger, Dominik, Elshaarawy, Omar, Chan, Anthony W. H., Kirstein, Martha, Mosconi, Cristina, Hucke, Florian, Palmer, Daniel, Pinato, David J., Sharma, Rohini, Ottaviani, Diego, Jang, Jeong W., Labeur, Tim A., Delden, Otto M., Pirisi, Mario, Stern, Nick, Sangro, Bruno, Meyer, Tim, Fateen, Waleed, García‐Fiñana, Marta, Gomaa, Asmaa, Waked, Imam, Rewisha, Eman, Aithal, Guru P., Travis, Simon, Kudo, Masatoshi, Cucchetti, Alessandro, Peck‐Radosavljevic, Markus, Takkenberg, R.B., Chan, Stephen L., Vogel, Arndt, Johnson, Philip J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc 01.07.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Aims The heterogeneity of intermediate‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the widespread use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) outside recommended guidelines have encouraged the development of scoring systems that predict patient survival. The aim of this study was to build and validate statistical models that offer individualized patient survival prediction using response to TACE as a variable. Approach and Results Clinically relevant baseline parameters were collected for 4,621 patients with HCC treated with TACE at 19 centers in 11 countries. In some of the centers, radiological responses (as assessed by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [mRECIST]) were also accrued. The data set was divided into a training set, an internal validation set, and two external validation sets. A pre‐TACE model (“Pre‐TACE‐Predict”) and a post‐TACE model (“Post‐TACE‐Predict”) that included response were built. The performance of the models in predicting overall survival (OS) was compared with existing ones. The median OS was 19.9 months. The factors influencing survival were tumor number and size, alpha‐fetoprotein, albumin, bilirubin, vascular invasion, cause, and response as assessed by mRECIST. The proposed models showed superior predictive accuracy compared with existing models (the hepatoma arterial embolization prognostic score and its various modifications) and allowed for patient stratification into four distinct risk categories whose median OS ranged from 7 months to more than 4 years. Conclusions A TACE‐specific and extensively validated model based on routinely available clinical features and response after first TACE permitted patient‐level prognostication.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Previously presented at the International Liver Cancer Association, London, 2018.
Funding: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (81172145 and 81420108020) for data collection in Xijing Hospital to G.H.; the National Institute for Health Research grant to D.J.P.; the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant (EP/N014499/1) to S.B. and M.G.F.; and the National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre grant (BRC‐1215‐20003) to W.F.
Potential conflict of interest: Dr. Toyoda is on the speakers’ bureau for MSD and AbbVie. Dr. Bettinger received grants from Bayer. Dr. Palmer advises and received grants from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Sirtex, Bayer, Eisai, and AZ. He received grants from BTG. Dr. Pinato consults for ViiV and received grants from Bristol‐Myers Squibb and MSD. Dr. van Delden consults for Coch Medical. Dr. Sangro consults for, is on the speakers’ bureau of, and received grants from Bristol‐Myers Squibb and Sirtex. He consults and is on the speakers’ bureau for Bayer and AZ. He consults for Adaptimmune, BTG, Lilly, Ipsen, and Enxeo. Dr. Meyer consults for and received grants from Bayer and BTG. He consults for Eisai, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, MSD, and Takeda. Dr. Aithal consults for GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Agios. Dr. Travis advises Guerbet and Boston Scientific. Dr. Kudo advises and received grants from Eisai, Ono, MSD, and Bristol‐Myers Squibb. He advises Bayer and Eli Lilly and received grants from AbbVie, Takeda, Gilead, Otsuka, and Taiho. Dr. Takkenberg advises and is on the speakers’ bureau for Norgine. He advises Gilead, is on the speakers’ bureau for Gore and Bayer, and received grants from GastroStart and ZonMw.
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.31022