Early Disease Activity or Clinical Response as Predictors of Long‐Term Outcomes With Certolizumab Pegol in Axial Spondyloarthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis

Objective Early identification of patients unlikely to achieve good long‐term disease control with anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is important for physicians following treat‐to‐target recommendations. Here we assess associations betw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArthritis care & research (2010) Vol. 69; no. 7; pp. 1030 - 1039
Main Authors van der Heijde, D., Deodhar, A., Fleischmann, R., Mease, P. J., Rudwaleit, M., Nurminen, T., Davies, O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2017
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Early identification of patients unlikely to achieve good long‐term disease control with anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is important for physicians following treat‐to‐target recommendations. Here we assess associations between disease activity or clinical response during the first 12 weeks of treatment and attainment of treatment targets at week 48 in axial SpA and PsA patients receiving certolizumab pegol. Methods The relationship between disease activity or clinical response during the first 12 weeks of treatment and achievement of week‐48 targets (for axial SpA: inactive disease based on Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] using the C‐reactive protein [CRP] level, or Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index <2 with normal CRP level; and for PsA: minimal disease activity) was assessed post hoc using RAPID‐axSpA and RAPID‐PsA trial data. Results A clear relationship between disease activity from week 2 to 12 and achievement of week‐48 treatment targets was observed in both axial SpA and PsA populations. In axial SpA, week‐48 ASDAS inactive disease was achieved by 0% of patients (0 of 21) with ASDAS very high disease activity at week 12, compared to 68% of patients (34 of 50) with week‐12 ASDAS inactive disease. For PsA, week‐48 minimal disease activity was achieved by 0% of patients (0 of 26) with Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) using the CRP level >5.1 at week 12, compared to 73% of patients (57 of 78) with DAS28‐CRP <2.6. Similar results were observed regardless of the disease activity measure used. Clinical response at week 12 also predicted week‐48 outcomes, though to a lesser extent than disease activity. Conclusion Using disease activity and the clinical response state during the first 12 weeks of certolizumab pegol treatment, it was possible to identify a subset of axial SpA and PsA patients unlikely to achieve long‐term treatment goals.
Bibliography:Supported by UCB Pharma.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Dr. van der Heijde has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi‐Aventis, and UCB Pharma (less than $10,000 each), and is the Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV. Dr. Deodhar has received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma (less than $10,000 each), and is on the advisory boards of AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Fleischmann has received research grants from Genetech, Roche, Abbott, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Pfizer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Sanofi‐Aventis, MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Janssen (less than $10,000 each), and has received consulting fees from Roche, Abbott, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Pfizer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Sanofi‐Aventis, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Janssen (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Mease has received research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma (less than $10,000 each), has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene, Covagen, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma (less than $10,000 each), and has received speaking fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Rudwaleit has received consulting fees from Abbott, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB Pharma (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Nurminen has received consulting fees from UCB Pharma (less than $10,000). Dr. Davies owns stock in UCB Pharma.
identifiers: NCT01087762 (RAPID‐axSpA), and NCT01087788 (RAPID‐PsA).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01087762 (RAPID‐axSpA), and NCT01087788 (RAPID‐PsA).
ISSN:2151-464X
2151-4658
DOI:10.1002/acr.23092