Development of Biogenic Amines in Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares): Effect of Storage and Correlation with Decarboxylase-Positive Bacterial Flora

The effects of storage at 0,4,10, and 22°C for 0,1,3,5, and 9 d on the quality of yellowfin tuna fillets as determined by microbiological assessment, development of some biogenic amines, and sensory analysis were studied. Tuna fillets stored at 22 °C for 3 d, 10 °C for 5 d, and 4 °C for 9 d were rat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of food science Vol. 67; no. 1; pp. 292 - 301
Main Authors Du, W.-X., Lin, C.-M., Phu, A.-T., Cornell, J.A., Marshall, M.R., Wei, C.-I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2002
Institute of Food Technologists
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effects of storage at 0,4,10, and 22°C for 0,1,3,5, and 9 d on the quality of yellowfin tuna fillets as determined by microbiological assessment, development of some biogenic amines, and sensory analysis were studied. Tuna fillets stored at 22 °C for 3 d, 10 °C for 5 d, and 4 °C for 9 d were rated unacceptable for consumption. Those stored at 22 °C for 3 d had total aerobic bacterial count of > 8 log10 CFU/g, a histamine‐producing bacterial population of 7 log10 CFU/g, and 832 ppm of histamine, 35.8 ppm of putrescine, and 147 ppm of cadaverine. A comparison of the capillary electrophoresis, AOAC fluorometric method, and gas chromatography showed a very good correlation (r2 > 0.99) among these 3 methods for histamine quantitation in tuna samples. Morganella morganii, Enterobacter agglomerans, Enterobacter intermedium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Proteins vulgaris, and Serratia liquefaciens were the decarboxylase‐positive bacterial species isolated by using the Niven's medium and identified during storage, which were responsible for histamine production in test tuna fillets.
Bibliography:istex:8310603D609BE18A67C8DCB5175C53B583BED119
ark:/67375/WNG-RWMB9FRM-0
ArticleID:JFDS292
The authors acknowledge the financial support by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric I Administration, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., through Grants No. NA46RG013704 to the National Coastal Resources Research and Development Institute, Portland, Oreg.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1147
1750-3841
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb11400.x