Occupation and risk of malignant pleural mesothelioma: A case-control study in Spain

Background The association of mesothelioma and asbestos exposure is well known, but some data suggest that probably many people are still being exposed to asbestos without knowing it. Methods Between 1993 and 1996, 132 cases (77% males) of histologically confirmed malignant pleural mesothelioma and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of industrial medicine Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 159 - 168
Main Authors Agudo, Antonio, González, Carlos A., Bleda, María J., Ramírez, José, Hernández, Santos, López, Francisca, Calleja, Asunción, Panadès, Rafael, Turuguet, Domènec, Escolar, Antonio, Beltrán, Manuel, González-Moya, José E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.02.2000
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The association of mesothelioma and asbestos exposure is well known, but some data suggest that probably many people are still being exposed to asbestos without knowing it. Methods Between 1993 and 1996, 132 cases (77% males) of histologically confirmed malignant pleural mesothelioma and 257 controls, residents in two provinces of Spain (Barcelona and Cádiz), were interviewed. They were classified according to their probability and intensity of occupational asbestos exposure by a panel of industrial hygienists, based on a detailed occupational history. Results Age and sex‐adjusted odds ratio (OR) for the highest probability of exposure to asbestos was 13.2 (95% confidence interval 6.4–27.3), and 27.1 (9.28–79.3) for high intensity. A dose–response trend was observed for both, probability and intensity. Overall, 61% of cases and 42% of controls had ever worked in an occupation with risk of asbestos exposure, with an OR of 2.59 (1.60–4.22). In our population 62% of cases could be attributed to occupational asbestos exposure. Conclusions A high risk of pleural mesothelioma due to occupational asbestos exposure is confirmed, but there is still a sizeable proportion for which no evidence of occupational exposure was found. Most of these cases could be due to other sources of asbestos exposure, mainly domestic or environmental. Am. J. Ind. Med. 37:159–168, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-312ZB32L-F
istex:F8485D07D6A385E7CE3ECFA887C0D850149F7C0E
FIS (Health Research Fund) of the Spanish Ministry of Health - No. 94/0550
BIOMED Programme of the CEE - No. PL931297
ArticleID:AJIM1
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0271-3586
1097-0274
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200002)37:2<159::AID-AJIM1>3.0.CO;2-0