Targeting the ectopy‐triggering ganglionated plexuses without pulmonary vein isolation prevents atrial fibrillation

Background Ganglionated plexuses (GPs) are implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF). Endocardial high‐frequency stimulation (HFS) delivered within the local atrial refractory period can trigger ectopy and AF from specific GP sites (ET‐GP). The aim of this study was to understand the role of ET‐GP abla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 235 - 244
Main Authors Sandler, Belinda, Kim, Min‐Young, Sikkel, Markus B., Malcolme‐Lawes, Louisa, Koa‐Wing, Michael, Whinnett, Zachary I., Coyle, Clare, Linton, Nick W. F., Lim, Phang B., Kanagaratnam, Prapa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Ganglionated plexuses (GPs) are implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF). Endocardial high‐frequency stimulation (HFS) delivered within the local atrial refractory period can trigger ectopy and AF from specific GP sites (ET‐GP). The aim of this study was to understand the role of ET‐GP ablation in the treatment of AF. Methods Patients with paroxysmal AF indicated for ablation were recruited. HFS mapping was performed globally around the left atrium to identify ET‐GP. ET‐GP was defined as atrial ectopy or atrial arrhythmia triggered by HFS. All ET‐GP were ablated, and PVs were left electrically connected. Outcomes were compared with a control group receiving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Patients were followed‐up for 12 months with multiple 48‐h Holter ECGs. Primary endpoint was ≥30 s AF/atrial tachycardia in ECGs. Results In total, 67 patients were recruited and randomized to ET‐GP ablation (n = 39) or PVI (n = 28). In the ET‐GP ablation group, 103 ± 28 HFS sites were tested per patient, identifying 21 ± 10 (20%) GPs. ET‐GP ablation used 23.3 ± 4.1 kWs total radiofrequency (RF) energy per patient, compared with 55.7 ± 22.7 kWs in PVI (p = <.0001). Duration of procedure was 3.7 ± 1.0 and 3.3 ± 0.7 h in ET‐GP ablation group and PVI, respectively (p = .07). Follow‐up at 12 months showed that 61% and 49% were free from ≥30 s of AF/AT with PVI and ET‐GP ablation respectively (log‐rank p = .27). Conclusions It is feasible to perform detailed global functional mapping with HFS and ablate ET‐GP to prevent AF. This provides direct evidence that ET‐GPs are part of the AF mechanism. The lower RF requirement implies that ET‐GP targets the AF pathway more specifically.
Bibliography:Belinda Sandler and Min‐Young Kim are joint first‐authors who contributed equally to this study.
Disclosures
None.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
Disclosures: None.
ISSN:1045-3873
1540-8167
DOI:10.1111/jce.14870