Satiety testing in diabetic gastroparesis: Effects of insulin pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring on upper gastrointestinal symptoms and gastric myoelectrical activity

Background Symptoms induced by caloric or non‐caloric satiety test meals and gastric myoelectrical activity (GMA) have not been studied in patients with diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) before and after intense glucose management. Aims We determined the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. e13720 - n/a
Main Authors Koch, Kenneth L., Hasler, William L., Van Natta, Mark, Calles‐Escandon, Jorge, Grover, Madhusudan, Pasricha, Pankaj J., Snape, William J., Parkman, Henry P., Abell, Thomas L., McCallum, Richard W., Nguyen, Linda A., Sarosiek, Irene, Farrugia, Gianrico, Tonascia, James, Lee, Linda, Miriel, Laura, Hamilton, Frank
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Symptoms induced by caloric or non‐caloric satiety test meals and gastric myoelectrical activity (GMA) have not been studied in patients with diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) before and after intense glucose management. Aims We determined the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on GI symptoms, volume consumed, and GMA induced by the caloric meal satiety test (CMST) and water load satiety test (WLST) in DGP. Methods Forty‐five patients with DGP underwent CMST and WLST at baseline and 24 weeks after CSII with CGM. Subjects ingested the test meals until they were completely full. Visual analog scales were used to quantify pre‐ and postmeal symptoms, and GMA was recorded with cutaneous electrodes and analyzed visually and by computer. Key Results At baseline and 24‐week visits, nausea, bloating, abdominal discomfort, and fullness were immediately increased after CMST and WLST (Ps < 0.01). The meal volumes ingested were significantly less than normal controls at both visits in almost one‐third of the subjects. After the CMST, the percentage 3 cycle per minute GMA increased and bradygastria decreased compared with WLST (Ps < 0.05). After treatment for 24 weeks meal volumes ingested, postmeal symptoms and GMA were no different than baseline. Conclusions and inferences (a) Satiety test meals elicited symptoms of nausea, bloating, and abdominal discomfort; (b) CMST stimulated more symptoms and changes in GMA than WLST; and (c) CSII with CGM for 24 weeks did not improve symptoms, volumes ingested, or GMA elicited by the two satiety test meals in these patients with diabetic GP. Satiety tests in diabetic gastropresis are useful to study acute postprandial symptoms and GMA, but these measures were not improved by intensive insulin therapy. Water load and caloric load satiety tests immediately increase symptoms associated with gastroparesis. Normal 3 cpm gastric myoelctrical activity increased more after caloric load than water load tests. After 24 weeks of insulin therapy there were no differences in volumes ingested, symptoms or gastric myooelectrical activity.
Bibliography:Funding information
The Gastroparesis Consortium (GpCRC) is supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) (grants U01DK112193, U01DK112194, U01DK073983, U01DK073975, U01DK074035, U01DK074007, U01DK073985, U01DK073974, U01DK074008) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) (grants UL1TR000424, UL1TR000093, UL1TR000433, UL1TR000135).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Mark L. Van Natta: analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content
James Tonascia: study design; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content.
Kenneth L. Koch: study design, enrollment of patients; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; study supervision.
Richard W. McCallum: study concept and design; enrollment of patients; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Pankaj J. Pasricha: enrollment of patients; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Linda Nguyen: enrollment of patients; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Henry P. Parkman: enrollment of patients, study concept and design; analysis and interpretation of data; writing manuscript.
Madhusudan Grover: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Laura Miriel: analysis and interpretation of data.
Frank Hamilton: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
See GpCRC Credit Roster
William J. Snape: enrollment of patients; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Gianrico Farrugia: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Authors contributions
William L. Hasler: study design, enrollment of patients; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Irene Sarosiek: enrollment of patients; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Jorge Calles-Escandon: study design; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content; study supervision.
Linda Lee: analysis and interpretation of data.
Thomas L. Abell: enrollment of patients; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
ISSN:1350-1925
1365-2982
1365-2982
DOI:10.1111/nmo.13720