Increased Menopausal Age Reduces the Risk of Parkinson's Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Approach

ABSTRACT Background Studies of Parkinson's disease (PD) and the association with age at menarche or menopause have reported inconsistent findings. Mendelian randomization (MR) may address measurement errors because of difficulties accurately reporting the age these life events occur. Objective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMovement disorders Vol. 36; no. 10; pp. 2264 - 2272
Main Authors Kusters, Cynthia D.J., Paul, Kimberly C., Duarte Folle, Aline, Keener, Adrienne M., Bronstein, Jeff M., Bertram, Lars, Hansen, Johnni, Horvath, Steve, Sinsheimer, Janet S., Lill, Christina M., Ritz, Beate R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.10.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Background Studies of Parkinson's disease (PD) and the association with age at menarche or menopause have reported inconsistent findings. Mendelian randomization (MR) may address measurement errors because of difficulties accurately reporting the age these life events occur. Objective We used MR to assess the association between age at menopause and age at menarche with PD risk. Methods We performed inverse variant‐weighted (IVW) MR analysis using external genome‐wide association study (GWAS) summary data from the United Kingdom biobank, and the effect estimates between genetic variants and PD among two population‐based studies (Parkinson's disease in Denmark (PASIDA) study, Denmark, and Parkinson's Environment and Gene study [PEG], United States) that enrolled 1737 female and 2430 male subjects of European ancestry. We, then, replicated our findings for age at menopause using summary statistics from the PD consortium (19 773 women), followed by a meta‐analysis combining all summary statistics. Results For each year increase in age at menopause, the risk for PD decreased (odds ration [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.98; P = 0.03) among women in our study, whereas there was no association among men (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85–1.11; P = 0.71). A replication using summary statistics from the PD consortium estimated an OR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90–0.99; P = 0.01), and we calculated a meta‐analytic OR of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89–0.98; P = 0.003). There was no indication for an association between age at menarche and PD (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.44–1.29; P = 0.29). Conclusions A later age at menopause was associated with a decreased risk of PD in women, supporting the hypothesis that sex hormones or other factors related to late menopause may be neuroprotective in PD. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
Bibliography:Funding sources
Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures
C.M.L. and L.B. received funding from the German Research Foundation for the genome‐wide SNP data generation and processing of the PEG and PASIDA GWAS data (DFG; FOR2488/1: LI 2654/2‐1 and BE 2287/5‐1). C.M.L. received support by a “habilitation grant” (H01‐2019) from the University of Lübeck. J.S.S. was partially funded by NIH/NHGRI grant HG009120. This project has been made available with funding from National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01‐ES010544, R01‐ES013717, U54‐ES012078, P01‐ES016732, and P50‐NS038367; initial pilot funding from NIH P30‐ES07048; a Community Fast Track grant by the MJFox Foundation; a pilot grant by the American Parkinson Disease Association; and from the Parkinson's Alliance. C.K. is supported by the NIH grant F32AG063442.
No conflicts of interest.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Beate R. Ritz was extensively involved in overseeing the project, gathering all required information (phenotypical and genetics data), the conception, organization and execution of the original PEG and PASIDA studies and this particular project, design and critiquing of the statistical analysis and in reviewing and critiquing the manuscript.
Cynthia DJ Kusters: performed all parts of this project, including conception, organization, execution, statistical analysis and manuscript writing and editing
Adrienne M Keener, Jeff M. Bronstein and Johnni Hansen were extensively involved in gathering of phenotypical data, reviewing and critiquing statistical analysis, and with the review and critiquing of the manuscript
Authors’ Roles
Lars Bertram and Christina M. Lill were critical in analyzing the genomic data for all patients, as well as reviewing and critiquing statistical and genetic analyses, and with the review and critiquing of the manuscript
Kimberly C Paul and Aline Duarte Folle: have been extensively involved in the research project conception, organization and execution, design, review and critiquing of the statistical analysis, and review and critiques of the manuscript
Steve Horvath, and Janet S. Sinsheimer were extensively involved in the design, execution and critiquing the statistical analysis, as well as review and critiquing of the manuscript.
ISSN:0885-3185
1531-8257
1531-8257
DOI:10.1002/mds.28760