Differences in the distribution of attention to trained procedure between finders and non-finders of the alternative better procedure

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 13; p. 934029
• Main Authors: Ninomiya, Yuki, Terai, Hitoshi, Miwa, Kazuhisa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 23.08.2022
• Subjects: curiosity (curiositas); Einstellung effect; eye movement analysis; mental set; problem solving; Psychology
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934029

The human ability to flexibly discover alternatives without fixating on a known solution supports a variety of human creative activities. Previous research has shown that people who discover an alternative procedure relax their attentional bias to information regarding the known solutions just prior to the discovery. This study examined whether the difference in the distribution of attention between the finders and non-finders of the alternative procedure is observed from the phase of solving the problem using the trained procedure. We evaluated the characteristics of the finders' distribution of attention in situations where problem solving using a trained procedure was successful. This aspect has been little examined in previous research. Our study obtained empirical evidence for the fact that, compared to non-finders, finders pay more attention to information unrelated to the trained procedure acquired through knowledge and experience, even time when using a trained procedure. We also confirmed that this difference does not exist from the beginning of the task, but emerges during repeated use of familiar procedures. These findings indicate that in order to find an alternative procedure, one should not only divert attention from a familiar procedure just before the discovery but also pay a certain amount of attention to information unrelated to the familiar procedure even when the familiar procedure is functioning well.