Ruxolitinib in Patients With Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus Infection: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Background: Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (CAEBV) infection is one of the EBV-positive T- or NK-cell lymphoproliferative diseases. There is no safe and effective treatment currently and the only proven curable therapy is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The JAK1/2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in pharmacology Vol. 12; p. 710400
Main Authors Song, Yue, Wang, Jingshi, Wang, Yini, Wang, Zhao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 06.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (CAEBV) infection is one of the EBV-positive T- or NK-cell lymphoproliferative diseases. There is no safe and effective treatment currently and the only proven curable therapy is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The JAK1/2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, is now considered a novel therapy in inflammatory disease, and hypercytokinemia is an important feature of CAEBV. Method: All patients who suffered active CAEBV and were treated with ruxolitinib as compassionate use in our center from Sep 1, 2017, and Apr 30, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: In general, seven out of nine patients responded to ruxolitinib. Six out of seven patients became afebrile within 48 h. The AST/ALT level of three out of four patients decreased after ruxolitinib treatment. Two patients with cytopenia recovered. No significant decrease in the EBV-DNA copy number was observed ( p = 0.161). For those seven patients who responded to ruxolitinib, the median continuing period in remission was 7.1 weeks (range, 3.4–101.0 weeks). Two patients achieved long-term stable remission with ruxolitinib monotherapy. None of these patients discontinued ruxolitinib due to the possible toxicity. Conclusion: Ruxolitinib is an effective and rather safe option for controlling the inflammatory symptoms of active CAEBV, especially in patients with CAEBV who have failed previous treatments or have relapsed. It can also play a promising role in improving the quality of daily life of patients and successfully bridging to allo-HSCT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by:Jan Styczynski, University of Bydgoszcz, Poland
Edited by:Tao Xu, Anhui Medical University, China
This article was submitted to Inflammation Pharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Xiangyu Zhao, Peking University People’s Hospital, China
ISSN:1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2021.710400