Improving the EMA Binding Test by Using Commercially Available Fluorescent Beads

Hereditary spherocytosis (HS) is a common anemia caused by germline mutations in red blood cell cytoskeleton proteins. The flow cytometry-based eosin-5′-maleimide (EMA) binding test is most frequently employed for reliable diagnostics. To perform this test, a number of healthy and ideally also age-m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in physiology Vol. 11; p. 569289
Main Authors Glenthøj, Andreas, Sharfo, Alaa, Brieghel, Christian, Nardo-Marino, Amina, Birgens, Henrik, Petersen, Jesper Brix
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 15.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hereditary spherocytosis (HS) is a common anemia caused by germline mutations in red blood cell cytoskeleton proteins. The flow cytometry-based eosin-5′-maleimide (EMA) binding test is most frequently employed for reliable diagnostics. To perform this test, a number of healthy and ideally also age-matched controls are required, which can be challenging and complicates interlaboratory comparisons. To overcome this limitation, we modified the EMA binding test by replacing healthy controls with commercially available fluorescent beads. Blood samples from 289 individuals with suspected HS were analyzed using the EMA binding test with fluorescent beads and benchmarked against regular EMA binding test using two control samples. Using osmotic gradient ektacytometry as validation, 112 individuals (38.8%) were diagnosed with HS. Performance of the modified EMA binding test was not compromised (accuracy 90.3%) compared to EMA binding test using matched controls (accuracy 88.6%). Based on these findings, we conclude that the modified EMA binding test with fluorescent beads is an attractive alternative, especially in laboratories without easy access to matched controls. Furthermore, as fluorescent beads are stable and easily commutable, they could facilitate both interlaboratory comparisons and quality assessment programs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Richard Van Wijk, Utrecht University, Netherlands
This article was submitted to Red Blood Cell Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Reviewed by: Satheesh Chonat, Emory University, United States; Elisa Fermo, IRCCS Ca’ Granda Foundation Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, Italy; Rob Van Zwieten, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Netherlands
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2020.569289