The Influence of Tertiary Education Disciplines on Self-Construals and Conflict Management Tendencies

While cultural difference on self-construal are well-documented, how acculturation to a new cultural environment could change an individual’s self-construal remains under-explored. In this research, how tertiary education disciplines could be associated with the endorsement of self-construals which,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 659301
Main Authors Wee, Sheila X. R., Choo, Wan Yee, Cheng, Chi-Ying
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 04.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While cultural difference on self-construal are well-documented, how acculturation to a new cultural environment could change an individual’s self-construal remains under-explored. In this research, how tertiary education disciplines could be associated with the endorsement of self-construals which, in turn, affect students’ conflict management tendencies were explored. Study 1 revealed that across the United States and Singapore, college students from business and social science disciplines exhibited the trend of endorsing more independent and interdependent self-construal respectively, regardless of the different dominant self-construals in the two countries. Study 2 explored how tertiary education disciplines is associated with individuals’ conflict management tendencies via the endorsement of different self-construals among Singaporeans. Findings showed that individuals from business discipline possess a more independent self-construal and in turn endorsed more of a competing conflict management style than those from social sciences. Different disciplinary cultures could link to conflict management tendencies via the endorsement of self-construals, yielding significant theoretical and practical implications.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Atsushi Oshio, Waseda University, Japan
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Jonathan Gore, Eastern Kentucky University, United States; Volkan Dogan, EskiŞehir Osmangazi University, Turkey
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659301