Moderation-Mediation Effects in Bilingualism and Cognitive Reserve

We first provide a critical review of the existing findings on bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve from moderator-mediator warranting cause-effect research conclusions. We next address the question of direct or indirect effects between bilingualism and neurocognitive protective factor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 572555
Main Authors Heredia, Roberto R., Blackburn, Angélique M., Vega, Luis A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 30.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We first provide a critical review of the existing findings on bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve from moderator-mediator warranting cause-effect research conclusions. We next address the question of direct or indirect effects between bilingualism and neurocognitive protective factors influencing the associated age-related mental deficits. The existing findings support bilingualism as a predictor and as a moderator. Third, we propose cognitive reserve models of bilingualism describing analytical approaches that allow testing of these models and hypotheses related to path strength and causal relationships between predictors, moderators, and mediators. Lastly and most importantly, we suggest using large datasets available via open repositories. This can aid in the testing of theoretical models, clarifying the roles of moderators and mediators, and assessing the research viability of multi-causal paths that can influence cognitive reserve. Creating collaborative datasets to test these models would greatly advance our field and identify critical variables in the study of the bilingual aging brain.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
This article was submitted to Cognitive Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: John A. E. Anderson, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Canada; John George Grundy, Iowa State University, United States
Edited by: Roberto Filippi, University College London, United Kingdom
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572555