A review of animal models for post-operative pericardial adhesions

Post-operative pericardial adhesions remain a serious complication after cardiac surgery that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Fibrous adhesions can destroy tissue planes leading to injury of surrounding vasculature, lengthening of operation time, and increased healthcare costs. While...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in surgery Vol. 9; p. 966410
Main Authors Hill, Morgan A., Walkowiak, O. Agata, Head, William T., Kwon, Jennie H., Kavarana, Minoo N., Rajab, Taufiek Konrad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 12.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Post-operative pericardial adhesions remain a serious complication after cardiac surgery that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Fibrous adhesions can destroy tissue planes leading to injury of surrounding vasculature, lengthening of operation time, and increased healthcare costs. While animal models are necessary for studying the formation and prevention of post-operative pericardial adhesions, a standardized animal model for inducing post-operative pericardial adhesions has not yet been established. In order to address this barrier to progress, an analysis of the literature on animal models for post-operative pericardial adhesions was performed. The animal model, method used to induce adhesions, and the time to allow development of adhesions were analyzed. Our analysis found that introduction of autologous blood into the pericardial cavity in addition to physical abrasion of the epicardium caused more severe adhesion formation in comparison to abrasion alone or abrasion with desiccation (vs. abrasion alone p  = 0.0002; vs. abrasion and desiccation p  = 0.0184). The most common time frame allowed for adhesion formation was 2 weeks, with the shortest time being 10 days and the longest being 12 months. Finally, we found that the difference in adhesion severity in all animal species was similar, suggesting the major determinants for the choice of model are animal size, animal cost, and the availability of research tools in the particular model. This survey of the literature provides a rational guide for researchers to select the appropriate adhesion induction modality, animal model, and time allowed for the development of adhesions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Reviewed by: Tomohisa Sakaue, Ehime University, Japan Dashuai Zhu, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
Edited by: Bernhard Winkler, Vienna Health Association, Austria
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Heart Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery
ISSN:2296-875X
2296-875X
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.966410