Reverse Trigger in Ventilated Non-ARDS Patients: A Phenomenon Can Not Be Ignored

• Published in: Frontiers in physiology Vol. 12; p. 670172
• Main Authors: Lin, Zhimin, Zhou, Jing, Lin, Xiaoling, Wang, Yingzhi, Zheng, Haichong, Huang, Weixiang, Liu, Xiaoqing, Li, Yimin, Zhong, Nanshan, Huang, Yongbo, Xu, Yuanda, Sang, Ling
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 29.07.2021
• Subjects: acute respiratory distress syndrome; mechanical ventilation; Physiology; respiratory mechanics; reverse triggering; sedation
• ISSN: 1664-042X; 1664-042X
• DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.670172

Introduction The role of reverse trigger (RT) was unknown in ventilated non-acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. So we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the incidence, characteristics and physiologic consequence of RT in such population. Method Six ventilated non-ARDS patients were included, the esophageal balloon catheter were placed for measurements of respiratory mechanics in all patients. And the data were analyzed to identified the occurrence of RT, duration of the entrainment, the entrainment pattern or ratio, the phase difference (dP) and the phase angle (θ), phenotypes, Effects and clinical correlations of RT. Result RT was detected in four patients of our series (66.7%), and the occurrence of RT varying from 19 to 88.6% of their recording time in these 4 patients. One patient (No.2) showed a stable 1:1 ratio and Mid-cycle RT was the most common phenotype. However, the remained patients showed a mixed ratios, and Late RT was the most common phenotype, followed by RT with breath stacking. The average values of mean phase delay and phase angles were 0.39s (0.32, 0.98) and 60.52° (49.66, 102.24). Mean phase delay and phase angles were shorter in early reverse triggering with early and delayed relaxation, and longer in mid, late RT and RT with breath stacking. Pmus was variable between patients and phenotypes, and larger Pmus was generated in Early RT, Delayed Relaxation and mid cycle RT. When the RT occurred, the Peso increased 17.27 (4.91, 19.71) cmH 2 O compared to the controlled breathing, and the average value of incremental ΔPeso varied widely inter and intra patients ( Table 3B and Figure 1 ). Larger ΔPeso was always generated in Early RT, Delayed Relaxation and mid cycle RT, accompanied by an significant increase of PL with 19.12 (0.75) cmH 2 O and 16.10 (6.23) cmH 2 O. Conclusion RT could also be observed in ventilated non-ARDS patients. The characteristics of pattern and phenotype was similar to RT in ARDS patients to a large extent. And RT appeared to alter lung stress and delivered volumes.