Automatic rating of therapist facilitative interpersonal skills in text: A natural language processing application

Background While message-based therapy has been shown to be effective in treating a range of mood disorders, it is critical to ensure that providers are meeting a consistently high standard of care over this medium. One recently developed measure of messaging quality–The Facilitative Interpersonal S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in digital health Vol. 4; p. 917918
Main Authors Zech, James M., Steele, Robert, Foley, Victoria K., Hull, Thomas D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 16.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background While message-based therapy has been shown to be effective in treating a range of mood disorders, it is critical to ensure that providers are meeting a consistently high standard of care over this medium. One recently developed measure of messaging quality–The Facilitative Interpersonal Skills Task for Text (FIS-T)–provides estimates of therapists’ demonstrated ability to convey psychotherapy's common factors (e.g., hopefulness, warmth, persuasiveness) over text. However, the FIS-T's scoring procedure relies on trained human coders to manually code responses, thereby rendering the FIS-T an unscalable quality control tool for large messaging therapy platforms. Objective In the present study, researchers developed two algorithms to automatically score therapist performance on the FIS-T task. Methods The FIS-T was administered to 978 messaging therapists, whose responses were then manually scored by a trained team of raters. Two machine learning algorithms were then trained on task-taker messages and coder scores: a support vector regressor (SVR) and a transformer-based neural network (DistilBERT). Results The DistilBERT model had superior performance on the prediction task while providing a distribution of ratings that was more closely aligned with those of human raters, versus SVR. Specifically, the DistilBERT model was able to explain 58.8% of the variance ( R 2 = 0.588) in human-derived ratings and realized a prediction mean absolute error of 0.134 on a 1–5 scale. Conclusions Algorithms can be effectively used to ensure that digital providers meet a consistently high standard of interactions in the course of messaging therapy. Natural language processing can be applied to develop new quality assurance systems in message-based digital psychotherapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Digital Mental Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Digital Health
Reviewed by: Rolf Holmqvist, Linköping University, Sweden Eduardo L. Bunge, Palo Alto University, United States
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
Edited by: Gelareh Mohammadi, University of New South Wales, Australia
ISSN:2673-253X
2673-253X
DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2022.917918