Comprehensive development and validation of gene signature for predicting survival in patients with glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain tumor, with rapid proliferation and fatal invasiveness. Large-scale genetic and epigenetic profiling studies have identified targets among molecular subgroups, yet agents developed against these targets have failed in late clinical development. We obtained...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in genetics Vol. 13; p. 900911
Main Authors Jin, Yi, Wang, Zhanwang, Xiang, Kaimin, Zhu, Yuxing, Cheng, Yaxin, Cao, Ke, Jiang, Jiaode
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 10.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain tumor, with rapid proliferation and fatal invasiveness. Large-scale genetic and epigenetic profiling studies have identified targets among molecular subgroups, yet agents developed against these targets have failed in late clinical development. We obtained the genomic and clinical data of GBM patients from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) and performed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox analysis to establish a risk model incorporating 17 genes in the CGGA693 RNA-seq cohort. This risk model was successfully validated using the CGGA325 validation set. Based on Cox regression analysis, this risk model may be an independent indicator of clinical efficacy. We also developed a survival nomogram prediction model that combines the clinical features of OS. To determine the novel classification based on the risk model, we classified the patients into two clusters using ConsensusClusterPlus, and evaluated the tumor immune environment with ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT. We also constructed clinical traits-related and co-expression modules through WGCNA analysis. We identified eight genes ( ANKRD20A4, CLOCK, CNTRL, ICA1, LARP4B, RASA2, RPS6 , and SET ) in the blue module and three genes ( MSH2 , ZBTB34 , and DDX31 ) in the turquoise module. Based on the public website TCGA, two biomarkers were significantly associated with poorer OS. Finally, through GSCALite, we re-evaluated the prognostic value of the essential biomarkers and verified MSH2 as a hub biomarker.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Miriam Bornhorst, Children’s National Hospital, United States
These authors have contributed equally to this work
Edited by: Francesco Pasqualetti, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
This article was submitted to Cancer Genetics and Oncogenomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
Bharati Mehani, National Cancer Institute (NIH), United States
ISSN:1664-8021
1664-8021
DOI:10.3389/fgene.2022.900911