Prevalence of Pre-antiretroviral-Treatment Drug Resistance by Gender, Age, and Other Factors in HIV-Infected Individuals Initiating Therapy in Kenya, 2013–2014

HIV-infected participants initiating first-line antiretroviral therapy in Kenya were tested for pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) using an oligonucleotide ligation assay. PDR was detected in 9.6% (95% CI, 7.9%–11.6%), including 19.5% (95% CI, 8.8%–34.9%) of all 18–24-year-old women. Abstract Backgr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 216; no. 12; pp. 1569 - 1578
Main Authors Silverman, Rachel A., Beck, Ingrid A., Kiptinness, Catherine, Levine, Molly, Milne, Ross, McGrath, Christine J., Bii, Steve, Richardson, Barbra A., John-Stewart, Grace, Chohan, Bhavna, Sakr, Samah R., Kiarie, James N., Frenkel, Lisa M., Chung, Michael H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published US Oxford University Press 19.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:HIV-infected participants initiating first-line antiretroviral therapy in Kenya were tested for pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) using an oligonucleotide ligation assay. PDR was detected in 9.6% (95% CI, 7.9%–11.6%), including 19.5% (95% CI, 8.8%–34.9%) of all 18–24-year-old women. Abstract Background Pre-antiretroviral-treatment drug resistance (PDR) is a predictor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment failure. We determined PDR prevalence and correlates in a Kenyan cohort. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-eligible HIV-infected participants. PDR was defined as ≥2% mutant frequency in a participant’s HIV quasispecies at pol codons K103N, Y181C, G190A, M184 V, or K65R by oligonucleotide ligation assay and Illumina sequencing. PDR prevalence was calculated by demographics and codon, stratifying by prior ARV experience. Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios. Results PDR prevalences (95% confidence interval [CI]) in 815 ARV-naive adults, 136 ARV-experienced adults, and 36 predominantly ARV-naive children were 9.4% (7.5%–11.7%), 12.5% (7.5%–19.3%), and 2.8% (0.1%–14.5%), respectively. Median mutant frequency within an individual’s HIV quasispecies was 67%. PDR prevalence in ARV-naive women 18–24 years old was 21.9% (9.3%–40.0%). Only age in females associated with PDR: A 5-year age decrease was associated with adjusted PDR prevalence ratio 1.20 (95% CI, 1.06–1.36; P = .004). Conclusions The high PDR prevalence may warrant resistance testing and/or alternative ARVs in high HIV prevalence settings, with attention to young women, likely to have recent infection and higher rates of resistance. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01898754.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1093/infdis/jix544