Comparison between optical techniques and confocal microscopy for defect detection on thin wires

Conventional microscopy techniques, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and confocal microscopy (CM) are not suitable for on-line surface inspection of fine metallic wires. In the recent years, some optical techniques have been developed to be used for those ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied surface science Vol. 238; no. 1-4; pp. 375 - 379
Main Authors Siegmann, Philip, Sanchez-Brea, Luis Miguel, Martinez-Anton, Juan Carlos, Bernabeu, Eusebio
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 15.11.2004
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Conventional microscopy techniques, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and confocal microscopy (CM) are not suitable for on-line surface inspection of fine metallic wires. In the recent years, some optical techniques have been developed to be used for those tasks. However, they need a rigorous validation. In this work, we have used confocal microscopy to obtain the topography z(x,y) of wires with longitudinal defects, such as dielines. The topography has been used to predict the light scattered by the wire. These simulations have been compared with experimental results, showing a good agreement.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-4332
1873-5584
DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.05.240