Large Lung Volumes Delay the Onset of the Physiological Breaking Point During Simulated Diving

During breath holding after face immersion there develops an urge to breathe. The point that would initiate the termination of the breath hold, the “physiological breaking point,” is thought to be primarily due to changes in blood gases. However, we theorized that other factors, such as lung volume,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in physiology Vol. 12; p. 731633
Main Authors McCulloch, Paul F., Gebhart, B. W., Schroer, J. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 29.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:During breath holding after face immersion there develops an urge to breathe. The point that would initiate the termination of the breath hold, the “physiological breaking point,” is thought to be primarily due to changes in blood gases. However, we theorized that other factors, such as lung volume, also contributes significantly to terminating breath holds during face immersion. Accordingly, nine naïve subjects (controls) and seven underwater hockey players (divers) voluntarily initiated face immersions in room temperature water at Total Lung Capacity (TLC) and Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) after pre-breathing air, 100% O 2 , 15% O 2 / 85% N 2 , or 5% CO 2 / 95% O 2 . Heart rate (HR), arterial blood pressure (BP), end-tidal CO 2 (etCO 2 ), and breath hold durations (BHD) were monitored during all face immersions. The decrease in HR and increase in BP were not significantly different at the two lung volumes, although the increase in BP was usually greater at FRC. BHD was significantly longer at TLC (54 ± 2 s) than at FRC (30 ± 2 s). Also, with each pre-breathed gas BHD was always longer at TLC. We found no consistent etCO 2 at which the breath holding terminated. BDHs were significantly longer in divers than in controls. We suggest that during breath holding with face immersion high lung volume acts directly within the brainstem to actively delay the attainment of the physiological breaking point, rather than acting indirectly as a sink to produce a slower build-up of PCO 2 .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Environmental, Aviation and Space Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Edited by: Fabrice Joulia, Université de Toulon, France
Deceased
Reviewed by: Alessandro Marroni, DAN Europe Foundation, Malta; Liubov Amirova, Institute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Russia
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2021.731633