Differences in structural connectivity between diabetic and psychological erectile dysfunction revealed by network-based statistic: A diffusion tensor imaging study

• Published in: Frontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) Vol. 13; p. 892563
• Main Authors: Chen, Jianhuai, Wu, Jindan, Huang, Xinfei, Sun, Rui, Xiang, Ziliang, Xu, Yan, Chen, Shi, Xu, Weilong, Yang, Jie, Chen, Yun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 27.07.2022
• Subjects: diffusion tensor imaging; Endocrinology; erectile dysfunction; network-based statistic; psychological erectile dysfunction; type 2 diabetes mellitus
• ISSN: 1664-2392; 1664-2392
• DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.892563

Introduction Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been found to be associated with abnormalities of the central and peripheral vascular nervous system, which were considered to be involved in the development of cognitive impairments and erectile dysfunction (ED). In addition, altered brain function and structure were identified in patients with ED, especially psychological ED (pED). However, the similarities and the differences of the central neural mechanisms underlying pED and T2DM with ED (DM-ED) remained unclear. Methods Diffusion tensor imaging data were acquired from 30 T2DM, 32 ED, and 31 DM-ED patients and 47 healthy controls (HCs). Then, whole-brain structural networks were constructed, which were mapped by connectivity matrices (90 × 90) representing the white matter between 90 brain regions parcellated by the anatomical automatic labeling template. Finally, the method of network-based statistic (NBS) was applied to assess the group differences of the structural connectivity. Results Our NBS analysis demonstrated three subnetworks with reduced structural connectivity in DM, pED, and DM-ED patients when compared to HCs, which were predominantly located in the prefrontal and subcortical areas. Compared with DM patients, DM-ED patients had an impaired subnetwork with increased structural connectivity, which were primarily located in the parietal regions. Compared with pED patients, an altered subnetwork with increased structural connectivity was identified in DM-ED patients, which were mainly located in the prefrontal and cingulate areas. Conclusion These findings highlighted that the reduced structural connections in the prefrontal and subcortical areas were similar mechanisms to those associated with pED and DM-ED. However, different connectivity patterns were found between pED and DM-ED, and the increased connectivity in the frontal–parietal network might be due to the compensation mechanisms that were devoted to improving erectile function.