The normative distribution of chest tube drainage volume after coronary artery bypass grafting

Background Little evidence exists to describe expected volumes of chest tube (CT) drainage after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Objectives The study objective was to map the trajectory of CT drainage volumes from insertion to removal after CABG. Design This was a retrospective, descriptive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart & lung Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 35 - 42
Main Authors Wynne, Rochelle, MEd, PGDACN - Cth, RN, MRCNA, Botti, Mari, PhD, BA, GDACP, DipN, RN, MRCNA, Copley, Deana, MNursing, Bailey, Michael, PhD, MSc, BSc
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 2007
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Little evidence exists to describe expected volumes of chest tube (CT) drainage after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Objectives The study objective was to map the trajectory of CT drainage volumes from insertion to removal after CABG. Design This was a retrospective, descriptive study. Patients The study included 239 patients who underwent CABG at a single metropolitan hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Results The sample (N = 234), aged 68.7 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.9), was predominantly male (N = 185, 79.1%). The mean duration of CT insertion was 45.2 hours (SD 26.7), and total drainage volume was 1300.6 mL (SD 763.8). Drainage volumes plateau to 31 mL per hour, 8 hours after surgery. From 24 to 48 hours, the mean drainage was 21 mL per hour. Drainage volumes varied between genders. Conclusions Evidence of similar drainage patterns in other populations is difficult to locate. If the pattern of drainage shown in this study is consistent, experimental intervention studies comparing standard removal time and earlier removal are recommended. If not, prospective collection of relevant preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors across multiple sites is necessary to determine which patient or practice variations influence CT drainage patterns after CABG.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0147-9563
1527-3288
DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.05.006