An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Risk Evaluation Model

Conflicts in land exploration are incisive social problems which have been the subject in many studies. Risk assessment of land conflicts is effective to resolve such problems. Specifically, fuzzy mathematics and the analytic hierarchy process were combined together to evaluate risk in land conflict...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 715003
Main Authors Peng, Geng, Han, Lu, Liu, Zeyan, Guo, Yanyang, Yan, Junai, Jia, Xinyu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 22.09.2021
Subjects
evaluation methods
government governance
land expropriation
mass unexpected
Psychology
risk assessment
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Conflicts in land exploration are incisive social problems which have been the subject in many studies. Risk assessment of land conflicts is effective to resolve such problems. Specifically, fuzzy mathematics and the analytic hierarchy process were combined together to evaluate risk in land conflicts in our work, which is proved useful to solve uncertainty and imprecision problems. Based on the analysis of the principles for the risk assessment of a land conflicts index system, a set of risk assessment indexes using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) was presented. The results show that the overall risk is at medium level, and the risk of the feasibility index and controllability index need to be paid more attention to. The contribution of this article is reflected in two aspects: (1) the application of FAHP in risk assessments of land conflicts is effective and valid; (2) it is helpful for governments to establish a stricter management system of work safety for conflicts in land exploration based on the risk assessment results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Alessandro Giuliani, National Institute of Health (ISS), Italy
Reviewed by: Rituparna Chutia, Cotton University, India; Florentin Smarandache, University of New Mexico, United States
This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715003