Establishment of the cumulative margin of exposure for a group of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners using an improved approach that accounts for both variability and uncertainty

► 1 out of 1000 individuals may have a cumulative MOE less than 20. ► The cumulative MOE mainly reflected the MOE for PCB 126. ► The MOE approaches discussed account for both variability and uncertainty. ► The RPF-based MOE approach is easier to implemented than the RPF-free approach. In this study,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology Vol. 65; no. 3; pp. 325 - 333
Main Authors Kalantari, Fereshteh, Bergkvist, Charlotte, Berglund, Marika, Fattore, Elena, Glynn, Anders, Håkansson, Helen, Sand, Salomon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.04.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► 1 out of 1000 individuals may have a cumulative MOE less than 20. ► The cumulative MOE mainly reflected the MOE for PCB 126. ► The MOE approaches discussed account for both variability and uncertainty. ► The RPF-based MOE approach is easier to implemented than the RPF-free approach. In this study, the cumulative margin of exposure (MOE) was estimated for a group of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) based on reduction of hepatic retinoids as a mode-of-action relevant toxicological endpoint. The MOE was defined as the ratio between a reference dose, derived using the benchmark dose (BMD) approach, and the estimated human dietary PCB exposure. A distribution for the cumulative MOE was established, taking into account inter- and intra-individual variability as well as uncertainty in data measurements. The cumulative MOE reflected mainly the MOE for PCB 126; other PCB congeners had little contribution to the cumulative exposure and MOE. The median of the 0.1st percentile for the cumulative MOE was about 20 for women; depending on the percentile, cumulative MOE was 2–4times higher for men compared to women. Furthermore, a relative potency factor (RPF) based approach was compared to an RPF-free approach for estimating the cumulative MOE. The RPF-free approach more completely accounts for variability and uncertainty but is more data intensive than the RPF-based approach, which can be more easily implemented in practice and allows for a use of historical data on RPFs. Consideration of the discussed approaches may contribute to improving cumulative health risk assessments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0273-2300
1096-0295
1096-0295
DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.01.005