A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages

This paper is a comprehensive meta-analysis of over 20 years of work-family conflict research. A series of path analyses were conducted to compare and contrast existing work-family conflict models, as well as a new model we developed which integrates and synthesizes current work-family theory and re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vocational behavior Vol. 74; no. 2; pp. 199 - 218
Main Authors Michel, Jesse S., Mitchelson, Jacqueline K., Kotrba, Lindsey M., LeBreton, James M., Baltes, Boris B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Elsevier Inc 01.04.2009
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper is a comprehensive meta-analysis of over 20 years of work-family conflict research. A series of path analyses were conducted to compare and contrast existing work-family conflict models, as well as a new model we developed which integrates and synthesizes current work-family theory and research. This new model accounted for 40% of the variance in job satisfaction, 38% of the variance in family satisfaction, and 35% of the variance in life satisfaction. In a critical examination of work-family linkages, a series of analyses excluding work-family conflict constructs and pathways resulted in a well-fitting and more parsimonious model that still accounted for 39% of the variance in job satisfaction, 37% of the variance in family satisfaction, and 33% of the variance in life satisfaction. Results indicate that direct effects drive work-family conflict models while indirect effects provide little incremental explanation in regards to satisfaction outcomes.
ISSN:0001-8791
1095-9084
DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.12.005