Fear of Movement/(Re)Injury: An Update to Descriptive Review of the Related Measures

The prevalence of fear of movement (kinesiophobia) in persistent pain ranges from 50 to 70%, and it may hinder the subsequent rehabilitation interventions. Therefore, the evaluation of fear of movement/(re)injury plays a crucial role in making clinical treatment decisions conducive to the promotion...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 696762
Main Authors Liu, Haowei, Huang, Li, Yang, Zongqian, Li, Hansen, Wang, Zhenhuan, Peng, Li
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 07.07.2021
Subjects
fear of movement/(re)injury
kinesiophobia
Psychology
questionnaires
scales
scoring system
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The prevalence of fear of movement (kinesiophobia) in persistent pain ranges from 50 to 70%, and it may hinder the subsequent rehabilitation interventions. Therefore, the evaluation of fear of movement/(re)injury plays a crucial role in making clinical treatment decisions conducive to the promotion of rehabilitation and prognosis. In the decision-making process of pain treatment, the assessment of fear of movement/(re)injury is mainly completed by scale/questionnaire. Scale/questionnaire is the most widely used instrument for measuring fear of movement/(re)injury in the decision-making process of pain treatment. At present, the most commonly used scale/questionnaire are the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), the Kinesiophobia Causes Scale (KCS), the Athlete Fear-Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ), and the Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS). In order to provide necessary tools and references for related research and rehabilitation treatment, this descriptive review is designed as an introduction to the background and content, score system, available language versions, variants of the original questionnaire, and psychometric properties of these scales/questionnaries.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Ansgar Thiel, University of Tübingen, Germany
Reviewed by: Dominic Malcolm, Loughborough University, United Kingdom; Cristiana Conti, University of Studies G. d'Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Italy
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696762