Comparison of the Ocular Microbiomes of Dry Eye Patients With and Without Autoimmune Disease
Purpose The pathogenesis of dry eye concomitant with autoimmune disease is different from that of dry eye without autoimmune disease. The aim of this study was to explore differences in the microbiota diversity and composition in dry eye with and without autoimmune disease. Methods Swab samples from...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology Vol. 11; p. 716867 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Frontiers Media S.A
22.09.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
The pathogenesis of dry eye concomitant with autoimmune disease is different from that of dry eye without autoimmune disease. The aim of this study was to explore differences in the microbiota diversity and composition in dry eye with and without autoimmune disease.
Methods
Swab samples from the inferior fornix of the conjunctival sac were obtained from dry eye patients without autoimmune disease (
n
= 49, dry eye group) and from those with autoimmune disease (
n
= 38, immdry eye group). Isolated bacterial DNAs from swabs were analyzed with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
Results
Analysis of the alpha diversity revealed no significant differences between subjects in the dry eye and immdry eye groups. Those in the immdry eye group had a distinct microbial composition compared with those in the dry eye group. The combination of the genera
Corynebacterium
and
Pelomonas
distinguished subjects in the immdry eye group from those in the dry eye group, with an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI = 0.62–0.84). For the same bacteria, the correlations between microbe abundance and the ocular surface parameters were different in the two groups. In addition, the functions of the microbial communities were altered in the two groups.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates changes in the composition and function of the ocular microbiome between subjects in the immdry eye and dry eye groups, which suggests that the potential pathogenesis is different. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by: Martin James Holland, University of London, United Kingdom This article was submitted to Microbiome in Health and Disease, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology These authors share first authorship Reviewed by: Maria D’Accolti, University of Ferrara, Italy; Harry Pickering, University of California, Los Angeles, United States |
ISSN: | 2235-2988 2235-2988 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fcimb.2021.716867 |