The Efficiency of Cooperative Learning in Physical Education on the Learning of Action Skills and Learning Motivation

This paper proposes a cooperative learning method for use in physical education, involving two different grouping methods: S-type heterogeneous grouping and “free” grouping. Cooperative learning was found to enhance the effectiveness of basketball skills learning and learning motivation. A compariso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 717528
Main Authors Yang, Cairu, Chen, Rongli, Chen, Xiaozhong, Lu, Kuan-Han
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 20.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper proposes a cooperative learning method for use in physical education, involving two different grouping methods: S-type heterogeneous grouping and “free” grouping. Cooperative learning was found to enhance the effectiveness of basketball skills learning and learning motivation. A comparison was made of the differences between action skills grouping (the control group) and “free” grouping (the experimental group). The ARCS Motivation Scale and Basketball Action Skills Test were used to measure results, and SPSS statistical analysis software was used for relevant statistical processing (with α set to.05). The results showed that overall skills, dribbling and passing among the action skills groups and “free” groupings significantly improved, but results for shooting were not significant; motivation levels for the two grouping methods significantly improved overall, and no significant differences in learning motivation and learning effectiveness were found between the different grouping methods. It is clear that teachers should first establish a good relationship between and with students, and free grouping methods can be used to good effect. Teachers using cooperative learning should intervene in a timely manner and choose suitable grouping methods according to the teaching goals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Chia-Chen Chen, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan
Reviewed by: Hsin-Te Wu, National Ilan University, Taiwan; Jiunn-Woei Lian, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717528